Deleon v. Neven et al

Filing 6

ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 11/22/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DXS)

Download PDF
Deleon v. Neven et al Doc. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 This is a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 in which petitioner, a state prisoner is proceeding pro se. On September 30, 2010, this court entered an order finding that petitioner had failed to submit either a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on the proper form or payment of the $5.00 filing fee. The court further found that petitioner had failed to submit his petition on the form required by the Local Rules of this court. The court therefore ordered the clerk to send petitioner the appropriate forms and gave petitioner thirty days to either file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or to have prison officials deduct from his prison account and send to the Clerk of Court the full $5.00 filing fee. The court also granted petitioner thirty days to file his petition on the correct form. Petitioner was expressly warned that failure to vs. D. W. NEVEN, et al., Respondents. STEVEN DELEON, Petitioner, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) / 2: 10-cv-01348-JCM-LRL ORDER Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 comply with the court's order would result in the dismissal of this action. Thirty days have now elapsed and petitioner has completely failed to comply with the court's order, having filed none of the required documents. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice. DATED this _____ day of ____________________, 2010. 22nd day November, 2010. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?