Righthaven LLC v. Democratic Underground, LLC et al

Filing 104

ORDER GRANTING 103 Stipulation to Extend Deadline. Responses due by 5/17/2011 re 95 First MOTION to Compel the Production of Documents By Defendant Democratic Underground, LLC and Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support Thereof. Democratic Underground shall have a two-day extension of time to file its reply to Righthaven's response. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 5/13/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 SHAWN A. MANGANO, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 6730 shawn@manganolaw.com SHAWN A. MANGANO, LTD. 9960 West Cheyenne Avenue, Suite 170 Las Vegas, Nevada 89129-7701 Tel: (702) 304-04732 Fax: (702) 922-3851 Attorney for Righthaven LLC 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 RIGHTHAVEN LLC, a Nevada limitedliability company, Case No.: 2:10-cv-01356-RLH-RJJ STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR RIGHTHAVEN LCC TO FILE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS FIRST MOTION TO COMPEL THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS Plaintiff, 11 12 v. 13 DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND, LLC, a District of Columbia limited-liability company; and DAVID ALLEN, an individual, 14 15 (First Request) Defendants. 16 17 18 DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND, LLC, a District of Columbia limited-liability company, 19 Counterclaimant, 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 v. RIGHTHAVEN LLC, a Nevada limitedliability company; and STEPHENS MEDIA LLC, a Nevada limited-liability company, Counterdefendants. 27 28 1 Case 2:10-cv-01356-RLH -GWF Document 103 Filed 05/12/11 Page 2 of 3 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BETWEEN Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, Righthaven LLC 1 2 (“Righthaven”), through its attorneys of record, Defendant/Counterclaimant, Democratic 3 Underground, LLC (“Democratic Underground”) and Defendant David Allen (collectively 4 referred to as “Defendants”), through their attorneys of record, and Counterdefendant, Stephens 5 Media LLC (“Stephens Media”), through its attorneys of record, that Righthaven’s Response to 6 Democratic Underground’s Motion to Compel (Doc. # 95) shall be due on or before May 17, 7 2011. In view of this extension of time, Democratic Underground shall have a two-day 8 extension of time to file its reply to Righthaven’s response. This stipulation for extension of time is being granted to accommodate Righthaven’s 9 10 counsel’s schedule, which includes attendance at deposition testimony and several substantive 11 responses to dispositive motions in other pending actions. This stipulation is sought in good 12 faith and not for purposes of delay. 13 /// 14 /// 15 /// 16 /// 17 /// 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 2 1 2 Dated this 12th day of May, 2011. FENWICK & WEST SHAWN A. MANGANO, LTD. By: /s/ Laurence F. Pulgram LAURENCE F. PULGRAM, ESQ. lpulgram@fenwick.com CLIFFORD C. WEBB, ESQ. cwebb@fenwick.com th 555 California Street, 12 Floor San Francisco, California 94104 By: /s/ Shawn A. Mangano__ ____ SHAWN A. MANGANO, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 6730 shawn@manganolaw.com 9960 West Cheyenne Avenue, Suite 170 Las Vegas, Nevada 89129-7701 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Attorney for Righthaven LLC KURT OPSAHL, ESQ. CORYNNE MCSHERRY, ESQ. CAMPBELL & WILLIAMS ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION 454 Shotwell Street San Francisco, California 94110 By: /s/ J. Colby Williams_____ J. COLBY WILLIAMS, ESQ. CHAD A. BOWERS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 5549 Nevada Bar No. 7283 jcw@campbellandwilliams.com CHAD A. BOWERS, LTD. DONALD J. CAMPBELL, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 1216 bowers@lawyer.com 3202 West Charleston Boulevard djc@campbellandwilliams.com Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 700 South Seventh Street____ Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Attorneys for Democratic Underground, LLC and David Allen Attorneys for Stephens Media LLC 16 17 18 19 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED: 22 23 24 25 _____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE GEORGE FOLEY, JR. UNITED STATES MAGISTRAGE JUDGE May 13, 2011 DATED: _____________________________ 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?