Righthaven LLC v. Democratic Underground, LLC et al

Filing 128

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (Second Request) --JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REVISED DISCOVERY SCHEDULE -- by Defendants David Allen, Democratic Underground, LLC. (Pulgram, Laurence)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 SAN FRANCISCO ATTORNEYS AT LAW F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LAURENCE F. PULGRAM (CA State Bar No. 115163) (pro hac vice) lpulgram@fenwick.com CLIFFORD C. WEBB (CA State Bar No. 260885) (pro hac vice) cwebb@fenwick.com JENNIFER J. JOHNSON (CA State Bar No. 252897) (pro hac vice) jjjohnson@fenwick.com FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street, 12th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 875-2300 Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 KURT OPSAHL (CA State Bar No. 191303) (pro hac vice) kurt@eff.org CORYNNE MCSHERRY (CA State Bar No. 221504) (pro hac vice) corynne@eff.org ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION 454 Shotwell Street San Francisco, California 94110 Telephone: (415) 436-9333 Facsimile: (415) 436-9993 CHAD BOWERS (NV State Bar No. 7283) bowers@lawyer.com CHAD A. BOWERS, LTD 3202 West Charleston Boulevard Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 Telephone: (702) 457-1001 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND, LLC, and Defendant DAVID ALLEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA RIGHTHAVEN LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND, LLC, a District of Columbia limited-liability company; and DAVID ALLEN, an individual, Defendants. Case No. 2:10-01356-RLH (GWF) JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REVISED DISCOVERY SCHEDULE DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND, LLC, a District of Columbia limited-liability company, Counterclaimant, (SECOND REQUEST) v. RIGHTHAVEN LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, and STEPHENS MEDIA LLC, a Nevada limited-liability company, Counterdefendants. JOINT STIP AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REVISED DISCOVERY SCHEDULE CASE NO. 2:10-CV-01356-RLH (GWF) IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BETWEEN Counterclaimant Democratic Underground, 1 2 LLC (“Democratic Underground”) and Counterdefendant Stephens Media LLC 3 (“Counterdefendant”), through their attorneys of record, as follows: 1. 4 On February 24, 2011, this Court entered the Joint Stipulation and Order to Stay 5 Discovery Conducted Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 20 and 45 Until Adjudication 6 of Pending Motions (the “Stipulation and Order Staying Discovery”), which tolled discovery 7 deadlines set forth in the Joint Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (Docket “Dkt.” 54) “for the 8 duration of time from February 10 until ruling by the Court on the pending Motions for Voluntary 9 Dismissal, the Cross-MSJ, and the Motion to Dismiss” (collectively, “the Motions”). (Dkt. 71, ¶ 10 11 15). 2. Pursuant to the Stipulation and Order Staying Discovery, “[w]ithin 10 days of such MOUNTAIN VIEW ATTORNEYS AT LAW F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 ruling, the parties shall submit a proposed agreed order resetting discovery dates on an equivalent 13 schedule.” (Dkt. 71, ¶ 15). 14 3. On June 14, 2011, the Court ruled on the Motions, dismissing Righthaven’s 15 complaint in its entirety for Righthaven’s lack of standing and denying Stephens Media’s Motion 16 to Dismiss. (Dkt. 116). 17 4. Democratic Underground’s Counterclaim still survives. 18 5. On June 23, 2011, Righthaven filed an Application to Intervene. 19 6. On June 29, 2011, Stephens Media filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the 20 21 22 23 denial of its Motion to Dismiss. 7. Democratic Underground may seek a stipulation or leave to file an Amended Counterclaim. 8. The parties agree that it would be necessary and beneficial to determine who the 24 parties are and what claims are at issue prior to submitting a proposed agreed order resetting 25 discovery cutoff dates. 26 9. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request, and the parties have agreed, to 27 extend the deadline for them to submit a proposed agreed order resetting discovery dates to the 28 date within 10 days of the resolution of participation of parties and their pleadings in this action. JOINT STIP AND [PROP] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REVISED DISCOVERY SCHEDULE 1 CASE NO. 2:10-CV-01356-RLH (GWF) This is the second request related to the discovery plan. This stipulated extension is 1 2 sought in good faith and not for purposes of delay. 3 4 Dated this 30 day of June, 2011 5 6 FENWICK & WEST LLP RIGHTHAVEN LLC By: By: 7 8 9 10 11 MOUNTAIN VIEW ATTORNEYS AT LAW F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 13 /s/ Laurence Pulgram LAURENCE PULGRAM, ESQ Laurence Pulgram, Esq. Fenwick & West LLP 555 California Street, 12th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimant DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND, LLC, and Defendant DAVID ALLEN /s/ Shawn A. Mangano SHAWN A. MANGANO, ESQ Shawn A. Mangano, Esq. Shawn A. Mangano, Ltd. 9960 West Cheyenne Avenue, Suite 170 Las Vegas, Nevada 89129 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant RIGHTHAVEN LLC STEPHENS MEDIA LLC 14 15 By: 16 17 /s/ J. Colby Williams J. COLBY WILLIAMS, ESQ J. Colby Williams, Esq. Campbell & Williams 700 South Seventh Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Attorneys for Counterdefendant STEPHENS MEDIA LLC 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIP AND [PROP] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REVISED DISCOVERY SCHEDULE 2 CASE NO. 2:10-CV-01356-RLH (GWF) 1 ATTORNEY ATTESTATION 2 3 I hereby attest that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. 4 /s/ Laurence F. Pulgram Laurence F. Pulgram 5 6 7 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED: 11 MOUNTAIN VIEW ATTORNEYS AT LAW F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 Dated: ______________________ 13 GEORGE W. FOLEY, Jr. United States Magistrate Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIP AND [PROP] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REVISED DISCOVERY SCHEDULE 3 CASE NO. 2:10-CV-01356-RLH (GWF)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?