Righthaven LLC v. Democratic Underground, LLC et al
Filing
83
Submission of PROPOSED ORDER on 82 Response to Motion,,,, ; filed by Defendants David Allen, Democratic Underground, LLC Denyiing Righthaven LLC's Motion for Reconsideration. (Pulgram, Laurence)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
LAURENCE F. PULGRAM (CA State Bar No. 115163) (pro hac vice) lpulgram@fenwick.com CLIFFORD C. WEBB (CA State Bar No. 260885) (pro hac vice) cwebb@fenwick.com FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street, 12th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 875-2300 Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 KURT OPSAHL (CA State Bar No. 191303) (pro hac vice) kurt@eff.org CORYNNE MCSHERRY (CA State Bar No. 221504) (pro hac vice) corynne@eff.org ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION 454 Shotwell Street San Francisco, California 94110 Telephone: (415) 436-9333 Facsimile: (415) 436-9993 CHAD BOWERS (NV State Bar No. 7283) bowers@lawyer.com CHAD A. BOWERS, LTD 3202 West Charleston Boulevard Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 Telephone: (702) 457-1001 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND, LLC, and Defendant DAVID ALLEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA RIGHTHAVEN LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND, LLC, a District of Columbia limited-liability company; and DAVID ALLEN, an individual, Defendants. DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND, LLC, a District of Columbia limited-liability company, Counterclaimant, v. RIGHTHAVEN LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, and STEPHENS MEDIA LLC, a Nevada limited-liability company, Counterdefendants.
PROPOSED ORDER DENYING RIGHTHAVEN LLC'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
Case No. 10-01356-RLH (GWF) [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING RIGHTHAVEN LLC'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
CASE NO. 2:10-CV-01356-RLH (GWF)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
The Court having considered the motion for reconsideration (Dkt. 78) and opposition (Dkt. 82), and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1) That the motion for reconsideration is hereby DENIED; 2) That Counterdefendants shall have twenty eight days from the filing of the motion for reconsideration, through and including April 6, 2011 in which to file a Response to Defendants' Supplemental Brief, and that Defendants shall have seven days thereafter, through and including April 13, 2011 in which to file a Reply.
Dated: ______________, 2011
____________________________________ The Honorable ROGER L. HUNT United States District Judge
PROPOSED ORDER DENYING RIGHTHAVEN LLC'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
1
CASE NO. 2:10-CV-01356-RLH (GWF)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?