Righthaven LLC v. Democratic Underground, LLC et al

Filing 95

First MOTION to Compel the Production of Documents By Defendant Democratic Underground, LLC and Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support Thereof by Defendants David Allen, Democratic Underground, LLC. Responses due by 5/15/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting Defendant's First Motion to Compel Production of Documents)(Webb, Cliff)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LAURENCE F. PULGRAM (CA State Bar No. 115163) (pro hac vice) lpulgram@fenwick.com CLIFFORD C. WEBB (CA State Bar No. 260885) (pro hac vice) cwebb@fenwick.com FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street, 12th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 875-2300 Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 KURT OPSAHL (CA State Bar No. 191303) (pro hac vice) kurt@eff.org CORYNNE MCSHERRY (CA State Bar No. 221504) (pro hac vice) corynne@eff.org ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION 454 Shotwell Street San Francisco, California 94110 Telephone: (415) 436-9333 Facsimile: (415) 436-9993 CHAD BOWERS (NV State Bar No. 7283) bowers@lawyer.com CHAD A. BOWERS, LTD 3202 West Charleston Boulevard Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 Telephone: (702) 457-1001 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND, LLC, and Defendant DAVID ALLEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA RIGHTHAVEN LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND, LLC, a District of Columbia limited-liability company; and DAVID ALLEN, an individual, Defendants. DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND, LLC, a District of Columbia limited-liability company, Counterclaimant, v. Case No. 10-01356-RLH (GWF) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND LLC’S FIRST MOTION TO COMPEL THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS RIGHTHAVEN LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, and STEPHENS MEDIA LLC, a Nevada limited-liability company, Counterdefendants. [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DU’S FIRST MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS CASE NO. 2:10-CV-01356-RLH (GWF) 1 The Court having considered Democratic Underground’s First Motion to Compel the 2 Production of Documents, all papers filed in support and in opposition, arguments of counsel, and 3 all other matters on file in this action and presented to the Court, 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 5 Pursuant to Rules 26 and 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant 6 Democratic Underground LLC’s First Motion to Compel the Production of Documents is 7 GRANTED. 8 9 10 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1) Righthaven shall produce all documents in response to Defendant’s Request Nos. 3, 4, 7, 10, 41, 42 and 58, in its possession, custody and control within ten (10) days of this Order; 11 2) Stephens Media shall produce all documents in response to Defendant’s Request Nos. 3, 12 4, 7, 10, 36, 53 and 69, in its possession, custody and control, including those in the 13 control of its agents including SI Content Monitor, within ten (10) days of this Order; 14 3) This Court’s Order of December 21, 2010, Docket 54 ¶A(5), required detailed privilege 15 logs to be provided within 21 days of the time documents were due to be produced for any 16 materials as to which privilege was being claimed. See also Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5). 17 That date passed long before the filing of the instant motion, with no log or other 18 specification of privileged materials provided. Accordingly, all privileges have been 19 waived as to all communications prior to the commencement of this action responsive to 20 the foregoing numbered document requests (see Docket 54 ¶A(5)), and all such 21 communications shall be produced within ten (10) days of this Order. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: ______________, 2011 ____________________________________ The Honorable George W. Foley United States District Court Magistrate Judge 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DU’S FIRST MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS 1 CASE NO. 2:10-CV-01356-RLH (GWF)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?