Ervine v. Desert View Regional Medical Center Holdings, LLC et al
Filing
41
ORDERED that defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 33 is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/22/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
2:10-CV-1494 JCM (RJJ)
SIE ERVINE,
Plaintiff,
v.
DESERT VIEW REGIONAL
MEDICAL CENTER HOLDINGS
LLC., et al.,
Defendants.
14
15
ORDER
16
Presently before the court is defendants Georges Tannoury’s (M.D.), Malin Kerry’s, Kerry
17
Malin’s and Specialty Medical Center’s motion for summary judgment. (Doc. #33). Defendant
18
Desert View Regional Medical Center Holdings, LLC, filed a joinder. (Doc. #34). The plaintiff has
19
responded (doc. #35), and the defendants have replied (docs. #36, 37).
20
Summary judgment is appropriate when, viewing the facts in the light most favorable to the
21
nonmoving party, there is no genuine issue of material fact, and the moving party is entitled to
22
judgment as a matter of law. Bagdadi v. Nazar, 84 F.3d 1194, 1197 (9th Cir. 1996); FED . R. CIV . P.
23
56(c). The moving party bears the burden of presenting authenticated evidence to demonstrate the
24
absence of any genuine issue of material fact for trial. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323
25
(1986); see Orr v. Bank of America, 285 F.3d 764 (9th Cir. 2002) (articulating the standard for
26
authentication of evidence on a motion for summary judgment).
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
Whereas the defendants have failed to properly authenticate any of the evidence provided to
1
support the motion for summary judgment under the standards set forth in Orr, the court declines
2
to consider the merits of the motion at this time.
3
Accordingly,
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that defendants’ motion for
5
6
summary judgment (doc. #33) is DENIED without prejudice.
DATED April 22, 2011.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?