Bacon v. State Of Nevada

Filing 3

ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. Clerk of court shall send two copies each of civil rights complaint form and application to proceed in forma pauperis to plaintiff. Clerk shall return a copy of the documents that Plaintiff filed in this action. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 10/5/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: plaintiff - EDS)

Download PDF
Bacon v. State Of Nevada Doc. 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiff's Complaint (#1) was filed on September 13, 2010. However, Plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. To bring a civil rights action, Plaintiff either must pay the $350.00 filing fee or submit a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. Pursuant to Local Rule LSR 1-1, a pauper application must be submitted on the Court's required form. Further, under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(2) and Local Rule LSR 1-2, a properly completed application requires both: (a) an inmate account statement; and (b) a financial certificate properly completed for a civil rights action. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action shall be DISMISSED without prejudice; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff two copies each of a civil rights complaint form and an application form to proceed in forma pauperis for v. STATE OF NEVADA, Defendant. PERCY LAVAE BACON, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:10-CV-01558-KJD-PAL ORDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 incarcerated persons. The Clerk shall return a copy of the documents that Plaintiff filed in this action. DATED this 5th day of October 2010. _____________________________ Kent J. Dawson United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?