Righthaven LLC v. PAHRUMP LIFE et al

Filing 41

ORDER Granting 39 Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application to File an Omnibus Response to 36 Amicus Curiae Brief. Response due by 6/22/2011. Reply due by 6/27/2011. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 6/17/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 RIGHTHAVEN LLC, 8 9 10 2:10-CV-1575 JCM (PAL) Plaintiff, v. PAHRUMP LIFE, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 ORDER 14 Presently before the court is plaintiff Righthaven’s ex parte application to file omnibus 15 response to amicus briefs. (Doc. #39). Amicus party Democratic Underground has filed a response. 16 (Doc. #40). 17 Righthaven requests an opportunity to respond to the amici’s arguments set forth in the 18 amicus curiae briefs. Democratic Underground responds that further briefing is unnecessary and, 19 alternatively, if the court allows further briefing, that any filing be limited to ten pages. 20 The court prefers to have the matter fully briefed before holding the hearing on the order to 21 show cause (doc. #), presently set for June 30, 2011. Accordingly, Righthaven may file a response 22 no later than Wednesday, June 22, 2011, and the amicus parties may file a final reply no later than 23 Monday, June 27, 2011. The court sees no reason to further restrict the page limits of the briefs 24 beyond that already dictated by the Local Rules. 25 Accordingly, 26 ... 27 ... 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that plaintiff’s ex parte 2 application to file an omnibus response to the amicus briefs (doc. #39) be, and the same hereby is, 3 GRANTED. 4 DATED June 17, 2011. 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?