Minshew v. Donley et al
Filing
101
ORDER Denying as moot 77 MOTION to Stay. Motion Hearing set for 7/19/2011 09:30 AM in LV Courtroom 3B before Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 6/28/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
6
7
8
9
10
MARY MAUREEN MINSHEW,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
MICHAEL B. DONLEY, et al.,
)
)
Defendants. )
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:10-cv-01593-PMP-PAL
ORDER
(Mot. To Stay - Dkt. #77)
11
12
Before the court is the Defendants’ Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Appeal (Dkt. #77).
13
The court has considered the Motion, Plaintiff’s Response (Dkt. #78), and Defendants’ Reply (Dkt
14
#85). The United States filed an appeal with the Ninth Circuit challenging the District Judge’s denial of
15
a motion for summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds. However, the Defendants
16
subsequently filed a Notice of Filing Motion to Dismiss Appeal and Withdrawal of Motion to Stay
17
(Dkt. #95). The Ninth Circuit entered an Order (Dkt. #96) on June 23, 2011, granting the United
18
States’ Motion to Dismiss its appeal, and a Proposed Order on Mandate (Dkt. #97) has been prepared.
19
IT IS ORDERED that:
20
1.
The Defendants’ Motion to Stay (Dkt. #77) is DENIED as MOOT.
21
2.
A hearing is set for July 19, 2011, at 9:30 a.m., on the Federal Defendant’s Motion to
22
Exclude Plaintiff’s Experts and Evidence of Damages for Failure to Make Proper
23
Disclosures (Dkt. #81); Motion to Seal (Dkt. #82); Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (Dkt.
24
#88); Motion to Seal (Dkt. #89); Motion to Seal (Dkt. #92); and Motion to Extend
25
Discovery Deadlines (Dkt. #93).
26
27
28
Dated this 28th day of June, 2011.
______________________________________
Peggy A. Leen
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?