Minshew v. Donley et al

Filing 101

ORDER Denying as moot 77 MOTION to Stay. Motion Hearing set for 7/19/2011 09:30 AM in LV Courtroom 3B before Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 6/28/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6 7 8 9 10 MARY MAUREEN MINSHEW, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) MICHAEL B. DONLEY, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:10-cv-01593-PMP-PAL ORDER (Mot. To Stay - Dkt. #77) 11 12 Before the court is the Defendants’ Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Appeal (Dkt. #77). 13 The court has considered the Motion, Plaintiff’s Response (Dkt. #78), and Defendants’ Reply (Dkt 14 #85). The United States filed an appeal with the Ninth Circuit challenging the District Judge’s denial of 15 a motion for summary judgment on qualified immunity grounds. However, the Defendants 16 subsequently filed a Notice of Filing Motion to Dismiss Appeal and Withdrawal of Motion to Stay 17 (Dkt. #95). The Ninth Circuit entered an Order (Dkt. #96) on June 23, 2011, granting the United 18 States’ Motion to Dismiss its appeal, and a Proposed Order on Mandate (Dkt. #97) has been prepared. 19 IT IS ORDERED that: 20 1. The Defendants’ Motion to Stay (Dkt. #77) is DENIED as MOOT. 21 2. A hearing is set for July 19, 2011, at 9:30 a.m., on the Federal Defendant’s Motion to 22 Exclude Plaintiff’s Experts and Evidence of Damages for Failure to Make Proper 23 Disclosures (Dkt. #81); Motion to Seal (Dkt. #82); Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (Dkt. 24 #88); Motion to Seal (Dkt. #89); Motion to Seal (Dkt. #92); and Motion to Extend 25 Discovery Deadlines (Dkt. #93). 26 27 28 Dated this 28th day of June, 2011. ______________________________________ Peggy A. Leen United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?