Minshew v. Donley et al

Filing 64

ORDER Approving 60 Stipulation and Proposed Order with the exception of subparagraphs (g) and (h). Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 3/9/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)

-PAL Minshew v. Donley et al

Doc. 64

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// /// /// The parties submitted a Stipulation and Proposed Order (Dkt. #60) to extend the Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order deadline which the court reviewed and approved with the exception of subparagraphs (g) and (h) of the proposed schedule on page four of the stipulation. Subparagraph (g) proposes that final lists of witnesses and exhibits "under LR 26(a)(3) shall be disclosed at least thirty days before trial." Subparagraph (h) proposes that the parties shall serve and promptly file objections to final lists of witnesses and exhibits "under LR 16(a)(3) within fourteen days after they are made." There is no LR 26(a)(3) or LR 16(a)(3). Rather, LR 16-3(c) mandates the content of the Joint Pretrial Order, and LR 16-4 provides the form of the Pretrial Order the parties are required to file. LR 261(e)(6) requires that the disclosures required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(3) and any objections be included in the Pretrial Order. Thus, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The parties' Stipulation and Proposed Order (Dkt. #60) is approved with the exception of subparagraphs (g) and (h). MARY MAUREEN MINSHEW, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) MICHAEL B. DONLEY, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case No. 2:10-cv-01593-PMP-PAL ORDER

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

2.

The parties shall comply with the requirements of LR 16-3(c), LR 16-4, and LR 261(e)(6).

Dated this 9th day of March, 2011.

______________________________________ Peggy A. Leen United States Magistrate Judge

2