Smith v. Scillia et al

Filing 38

ORDER Granting 36 Motion to Dismiss. Petition and this action are dismissed without prejudice. No certificate of appealability shall issue. Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 10/23/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 BRECK SMITH, 8 9 10 11 Petitioner, vs. D.W. NEVEN, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:10-CV-01596-PMP-PAL ORDER 12 This is an action initiated by Breck Smith, a state prisoner, on a petition for writ of habeas corpus 13 (ECF No. 10). Petitioner has filed an amended petition (ECF No. 19) and was granted leave to 14 consolidate another habeas petition with this one, filing a supplemental petition (ECF No. 26). 15 Respondents filed an answer (ECF No. 28) and petitioner a reply (ECF No. 34). However, prior to a 16 decision being reached on the merits of the claims, petitioner filed a motion to dismiss the petition 17 without prejudice (ECF No. 38), which respondents have not opposed. Petitioner indicates a desire to 18 pursue his claims in state court and declares his understanding of the consequences of his motion. Good 19 cause appearing, the motion (ECF No. 36) is GRANTED. The petition and this action will be 20 dismissed without prejudice. Given that this is a voluntary dismissal, the Court finds that jurists of 21 reason would not find the granting of the motion to be debatable. Therefore, no certificate of 22 appealability shall issue. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated this ___23rd___ day of October, 2013. 25 26 ___________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?