Ali v. City Of North Las Vegas et al
Filing
46
ORDER Denying 45 Plaintiff's Motion for Court Order to Serve Defendants. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 11/19/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
FALASHA ALI,
11
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
Case No. 2:10-CV-01690-KJD-PAL
CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, et al.,
14
ORDER
Defendants.
15
16
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Court Order to Serve Defendants (#45).
17
On December 20, 2013, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals summarily affirmed the Court’s order
18
dismissing the claims against all parties other than Defendant City of North Las Vegas. See Order,
19
Docket No. 36. Instead, the Ninth Circuit reversed the Court’s judgment against the City of North
20
Las Vegas and ordered that those claims be dismissed without prejudice for lack of proper service.
21
Id. Mandate (#37) issued on January 14, 2014, and the Court issued its Order on Mandate (#40),
22
complying with the order of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and dismissing the claims against the
23
City of North Las Vegas without prejudice.
24
Defendant then filed an Amended Complaint (#41) in this closed action on May 9, 2014.
25
Since this action is closed and all claims have been dismissed, the only appropriate action is for
26
Plaintiff to file the claims against the City of North Las Vegas in an entirely new action.
1
2
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Court Order to Serve
Defendants (#45) is DENIED.
DATED this 19th day of November 2014.
4
5
6
7
_____________________________
Kent J. Dawson
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?