Kuzova et al v. USDHS et al
Filing
62
ORDER that the stay of discovery previously ordered in this case is hereby lifted and Plaintiffs may proceed with discovery regarding the Alien A-Files. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 07/24/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
YANITA KUZOVA, et al.,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
)
HOMELAND SECURITY, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:10-cv-01711-GMN-GWF
ORDER
13
The Court conducted a hearing in this matter on July 16, 2012 pursuant to Plaintiffs’ Notice
14
of Termination of Removal Proceedings Against Plaintiff Kuzova and Dismissal of Fraud Charges
15
of Removability Against Maria Reed and Request for the Scheduling of a Status Conference
16
Hearing (#57), filed on July 5, 2012.
17
The Court previously stayed discovery in this case based on the pendency of removal
18
proceedings against Plaintiff Kuzova and her mother Maria Reed. See Orders (#44), filed August
19
3, 2011. On June 26, 2012, an Immigration Judge dismissed the removal proceedings against Ms.
20
Kuzova and Ms. Reed. Notice of Termination of Removal Proceedings (#57) (attaching copies of
21
Immigration Judge’s orders). Although the government has until July 26, 2012 to appeal from the
22
orders, the Defendants’ counsel informed the Court on July16, 2012 that it is unlikely the
23
government will appeal the dismissal of the removal proceedings. Plaintiffs accordingly request
24
that the Court lift the stay on discovery and permit them to proceed. Plaintiffs’ counsel also
25
advised the Court that the only discovery that Plaintiffs seek in this action is the production of Ms.
26
Kuzova’s and Ms. Reed’s United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS) “Alien A-
27
Files, which contain documents relating to Ms. Kuzova’s naturalization application and Ms. Reed’s
28
prior naturalization proceeding. Ms. Kuzova’s naturalization application has reportedly been
1
challenged based on the allegation that Ms. Reed entered into a fraudulent marriage to a United
2
States citizen. Defendants argue that the Court should not lift the discovery stay pending a decision
3
on its still pending alternative motion to remand this action to the USCIS pursuant to 8 U.S.C.
4
§1447. The Defendants also argue that the Alien A-Files are irrelevant.
5
Based on the limited scope of discovery sought by Plaintiffs, production of the Alien A-
6
Files, the Court sees no need to continue the stay of discovery pending a decision on whether this
7
action should be remanded to the USCIS. Even assuming that the action is remanded, information
8
contained in the file may be relevant in the remanded proceeding before the Service. The scope of
9
relevancy under Rule 26(b)(1) is broad and the burden is generally on the party opposing discovery
10
to show that it is overly broad, unduly burdensome or irrelevant. The Alien A-Files appear likely to
11
contain information relevant to Plaintiffs’ claim. See Dent v. Holder, 627 F.3d 365 (9th Cir. 2010).
12
Defendants have not provided any basis for their contention that the files are irrelevant.
13
Accordingly,
14
15
16
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stay of discovery previously ordered in this case is
hereby lifted and Plaintiffs may proceed with discovery regarding the Alien A-Files.
DATED this 24th day of July, 2012.
17
18
19
______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?