Dixon v. Bannister et al

Filing 33

ORDER Denying 29 Motion for Clarification of the Courts Screening Order and Request for Leave to File a Subsequent Motion for Summary Judgment With Respect to Any Remaining Claims. Plaintiffs state law claims are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice to pursue those claims in state court. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 5/31/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

***
)
FREDRIC DIXON,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
ROBERT BANNISTER, HOWARD
)
SKOLNICK, NEVADA DEPARTMENT )
OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF
)
NEVADA, and DR. BITAR,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)

2:10-CV-01714-PMP-RJJ
ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Clarification of the Court’s

15

Screening Order and Request for Leave to File a Subsequent Motion for Summary

16

Judgment With Respect to Any Remaining Claims (Doc. #29) is hereby DENIED.

17

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will decline to exercise supplemental

18

jurisdiction over Plaintiffs’ remaining state law claims. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3).

19

Plaintiffs’ state law claims are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice to pursue those

20

claims in state court.

21
22
23
24
25
26

DATED: May 31, 2012
_______________________________
PHILIP M. PRO
United States District Judge