Myers-Desco v. Lowe's HIW, Inc.

Filing 22

ORDER granting 21 Ex Parte Motion to Remove Counsel from CM/ECF Service List. Plaintiff shall no longer be represented by Ms. Baumgardner, bur she shall continue to be represented by Nelson Law. The Clerk shall remove Ms. Baumgardner from the CM/ECF service list. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 3/1/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

Download PDF
-PAL Myers-Desco v. Lowe's HIW, Inc. Doc. 22 1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ___________________________________ PEGGY A. LEEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 3. This matter is before the court on the Motion to Remove Counsel From CM/ECF Service List and Request to Discontinue Notice and Special Notice (Dkt. #21) filed February 14, 2011. Rebekah L. Baumgardner seeks to withdraw as counsel of record for Plaintiff Ellamae Myers-Desco and be removed from the CM/ECF service list. The Motion represents that Ms. Baumgardner is no longer associated with Nelson Law Firm, which firm will continue to represent Plaintiff. Local Rule IA 10-6 provides that "no withdrawal . . . shall be approved if delay of discovery, the trial or any hearing in the case would result." This case was removed to this court on October 7, 2010. Having reviewed and considered the matter, and for good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED: 1. 2. The Motion to Remove (Dkt. #21) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall no longer be represented by Ms. Baumgardner, bur she shall continue to be represented by Nelson Law. The Clerk shall remove Ms. Baumgardner from the CM/ECF service list. ELLAMAE MYERS-DESCO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) LOWE'S HIW, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:10-cv-01746-RLH-PAL ORDER (Mtn to Remove - Dkt. #21) Dated this 1st day of March, 2011. Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?