Trustees of the Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers Local 13 Defined Contribution Pension Trust For Southern Nevada et al v. Patton & Patton Marble & Granite, Inc. et al
Filing
48
ORDER Denying 44 Proposed Order Submission. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 12/13/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
6
7
TRUSTEES OF THE BRICKLAYERS &
8 ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 13
DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PENSION
9 TRUST FOR SOUTHERN NEVADA, et al,
)
)
)
)
)
10
Plaintiffs,
)
)
11 vs.
)
)
12 PATTON & PATTON MARBLE & GRANITE, )
INC., a Nevada corporation; SHEREE )
13 PATTON, individually; BILLY
)
PATTON, individually; and ROBERT
)
14 TURNER, individually,
)
)
15
Defendants.
)
)
16
)
2:10-cv-01867-ECR-RJJ
Order
17
On September 9, 2011, the Court issued an Amended Order (#43)
18
granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary
19
Judgment, incorporating findings of fact and conclusions of law.
On
20
September 15, 2011, Plaintiffs filed a proposed order and judgment
21
(#44).
We have previously indicated in our Order (#43) that
22
judgment shall not be entered until all parties and all claims have
23
been adjudicated.
24
The Court denied summary judgment against Defendant Billy
25
Patton, and the action is stayed against Defendant Robert Turner due
26
to bankruptcy.
It appears that Defendant Billy Patton has not
27
participated in the action after withdrawal of counsel, and
28
1 Plaintiffs may seek appropriate relief in the form of a default.
2 The Court declines to enter judgment at this time while the action
3 remains open against Defendant Billy Patton and Defendant Robert
4 Turner.
Plaintiffs’ proposed order and judgment (#44), which we
5 treat as a motion for entry of judgment, is DENIED.
6
7 DATE: December 13, 2011.
8
____________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?