Pinckney v. Bell et al
ORDERED that 7 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and taht judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 3/23/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
-GWF Stewart v. Skolnik, et al
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA *** ROGER STEWART, #79447, Plaintiff, vs. HOWARD SKOLNIK, et al., Defendants.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:10-CV-01894-PMP-GWF ORDER
Before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #7) filed February 3, 2011. Although the Court has extended Plaintiff's deadline to respond to Defendants' motion, Plaintiff has failed to do so and therefore consents to the granting of Defendants' motion. Moreover, a review of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss shows that Defendants are entitled to the relief requested because Plaintiff has failed to exhaust his available administrative remedies. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #7) is GRANTED and that judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff. DATED: March 23, 2011.
PHILIP M. PRO United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?