Robert Bosch LLC v. ADM21., Ltd. et al

Filing 111

ORDER Granting 110 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by Robert Bosch LLC. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/4/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Todd M. Touton, Nevada Bar No. 1744
Marla J. Hudgens, Nevada Bar No. 11098
LIONEL SAWYER & COLLINS
1700 Bank of America Plaza
300 South Fourth Street
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
[phone] (Telephone)
[phone] (Fax)
Mark A. Hannemann, pro hac vice
Jeffrey S. Ginsberg, pro hac vice
KENYON & KENYON LLP
One Broadway
New York, NY 10004
[phone] (Telephone)
[phone] (Fax)
Attorneys for Robert Bosch LLC

10
11
12
13
14

Michael D. Rounds, Nevada Bar No. 4734
Adam K. Yowell, Nevada Bar No. 11748
WATSON ROUNDS
5371 Kietzke Lane
Reno, NV 89511-2083
[phone] (Telephone)
[phone] (Fax)

18

Russell E. Levine, P.C., pro hac vice
Craig D. Leavell, pro hac vice
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
300 North LaSalle Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60654
[phone] (Telephone)
[phone] (Fax)

19

Attorneys for Defendants

15
16
17

20

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

21

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

22

ROBERT BOSCH LLC,
Case No. 2:10-cv-01930-MMD-RJJ
Plaintiff,

23
24
25
26

v.
ADM 21 CO., LTD.; ADM USA; and
ADM NORTH AMERICA,
Defendants.

27
28

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

WHEREAS, Robert Bosch LLC (“BOSCH”) instituted this patent-infringement action

2

against ADM21 Co., Ltd., ADM USA, and ADM North America (collectively, “ADM”) on

3

November 3, 2010,

4

WHEREAS, this patent-infringement action was stayed on January 3, 2012, pursuant to

5

28 U.S.C. § 1659(a), in light of the investigation in the United States International Trade

6

Commission, captioned In re Certain Wiper Blades, Inv. No. 337-TA-816 (D.I. 104), and

7

WHEREAS, the parties have entered into a settlement agreement to resolve this action

8

and the corresponding investigation in the United States International Trade Commission,

9

captioned In re Certain Wiper Blades, Inv. No. 337-TA-816, with an effective date of January

10

27, 2014.

11

THEREFORE, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), BOSCH and ADM hereby stipulate to

12

the dismissal of all of BOSCH’s claims in this action with prejudice. BOSCH and ADM further

13

stipulate to the dismissal of all of ADM’s counterclaims in this action with prejudice, with the

14

exception that ADM shall not be barred by this dismissal from asserting any or all such

15

counterclaims in response to any assertion by Bosch of infringement by ADM of any of the

16

patents-in-suit. Each party will bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. The parties consent to

17

and request that the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of their settlement agreement

18

///

19

///

20

///

21

///

22

///

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

-2-

1

under the authority of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 511 U.S. 375 (1994).

2

Dated: February 3, 2014

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Marla J. Hudgens
________________________________
Todd M. Touton
Nevada Bar No. 1744
Marla J. Hudgens
Nevada Bar No. 11098
LIONEL SAWYER & COLLINS
1700 Bank of America Plaza
300 South Fourth Street
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101

/s/ Michael D. Rounds
________________________________
Michael D. Rounds
Nevada Bar No. 4734
Adam K. Yowell
Nevada Bar. No. 11748
WATSON ROUNDS
5371 Kietzke Lane
Reno, NV 89511-2083

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Mark A. Hannemann
Jeffrey S. Ginsberg
KENYON & KENYON LLP
One Broadway
New York, NY 10004

Russell E. Levine, P.C.
Craig D. Leavell
Kirkland & Ellis LLP
300 North LaSalle Street, 26th Floor
Chicago, IL 60654

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Attorneys for Defendants

14
15
16

SO ORDERED:

17
18
19

February 4,
Dated: _______________, 2014

____________________________________
HON. MIRANDA M. DU
United States District Judge

20
21
22
23
24
25
26

-3-