Herb Reed Enterprises, Inc. et al v. Bennett et al

Filing 60

DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION as to Defendants Five Platters, Inc. and Personality Productions, Inc. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/16/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

Download PDF
Case 2:10-cv-01981-JCM -RJJ Document 55 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Filed 05/02/11 Page 1 of 4 JOHN L. KRIEGER (Nevada Bar No. 6023) JKrieger@LRLaw.com LEWIS AND ROCA LLP 3993 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 600 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 (702) 949-8200 (702) 949-8365 (fax) ERIC SOMMERS (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) SOMMERS LAW, PLLC 600 State Street, Suite 1 Portsmouth, New Hampshire 03801 (603) 570-4854 Attorneys for Herb Reed Enterprises, Inc., Herb Reed Enterprises, LLC and Herbert Reed 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 13 14 15 HERB REED ENTERPRISES, INC., a Delaware company; HERB REED ENTERPRISES, LLC, a Massachusetts company; and HERBERT REED, an individual, 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff, CASE NO: 2:10-CV-01981-JCM-RJJ [PROPOSED] DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION v. JEAN BENNETT, an individual; FIVE PLATTERS, INC., a California corporation; and PERSONALITY PRODUCTIONS, INC., a Nevada corporation 20 Defendants 21 22 This matter having come before the Court on plaintiffs Herb Reed Enterprises, Inc. Herb 23 Reed Enterprises, LLC, and Herbert Reed’s Motion for Default Judgment and the court having 24 granted the motion, therefore, 25 26 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUGED AND DECREED that A. That Defendants Five Platters Inc. and Personality Production have never 27 used the mark “The Platters” in a manner that is not false and misleading and thus never 28 Lewis and Roca LLP 40 North Central Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4429 acquired common law rights to the mark and cannot assert that they have. -1- Case 2:10-cv-01981-JCM -RJJ Document 55 1 2 3 B. Filed 05/02/11 Page 2 of 4 Herbert Reed, having first used the mark “The Platters” in commerce in 1953, and having continuously used the mark in commerce since then has superior rights to the mark to all others, including Five Platters, Inc. and Personality Productions, Inc., and 4 anyone claiming rights from or through them. 5 6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUGED AND DECREED that Defendants Five 7 Platters. Inc. (“FPI”) and Personality Productions, Inc. (“PPI”), their agents, servants, 8 representatives, licensees, affiliates, successors, assigns, attorneys, partners, officers, employees, 9 successors, and assigns of each and all persons, firms, or corporations in active concert of 10 11 participation with any of them, are immediately and permanently enjoined, anywhere in the world, directly or indirectly, as follows: 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 A. From using the name “The Platters” or any other name referring to or including the word “Platter” or “Platters” and any other name or names confusingly similar or derivative thereof; B. From licensing, claiming to have licensed, otherwise purporting to grant, or have granted, any rights to any person or entity to engage in any live musical performance or related entertainment using the name “The Platters,” “The Buck Ram Platters,” “The Platters Featuring (the name of any person(s) or entity(ies))” or any other name or names 20 21 22 confusingly similar or derivative thereof; C. From causing, aiding, or assisting any person or entity to engage in any live 23 musical performance or related entertainment service using the name “The Platters,” “The 24 Buck Ram Platters,” “The Platters Featuring (the name of any person(s) or entity(ies))” or 25 any other name or names confusingly similar or derivative thereof; 26 D. From promotional activities or advertising, television, radio, internet or any 27 print or non-print media undertaken and commissioned using the name “The Platters” or 28 Lewis and Roca LLP 40 North Central Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4429 any other name or names confusingly similar or derivative thereof; -2- Case 2:10-cv-01981-JCM -RJJ Document 55 1 2 3 E. Filed 05/02/11 Page 3 of 4 From infringing upon the goodwill associated with any of Plaintiffs’ names or service marks, or otherwise using the name “The Platters,” or any other name or names confusingly similar or derivative thereof; 4 F. From infringing or otherwise using the name “The Platters” or any other 5 6 name confusingly similar thereof, in any manner, including, but not limited to, advertising, 7 promoting or licensing the performance of any group or individual that infringes upon 8 Plaintiffs’ marks or derivatives thereof; 9 10 11 G. From engaging in any conduct, including the advertisement, promotion, performance or licensing of any performance or performers using the name “The Platters or any other name confusingly similar thereof, that tends to falsely represent, or is likely to 12 13 14 confuse, mislead, or deceive purchasers of Plaintiffs’ services, Plaintiffs’ customers, Plaintiffs’ promoters, or members of the public to believe that Defendants are sponsored, 15 approved or licensed by Plaintiffs or anyone else, or are in some way associated, affiliated 16 or connected with the Plaintiffs or “The Platters;” 17 18 19 H. From diluting and infringing the trade name “The Platters” or damaging Plaintiffs’ goodwill, reputation, and business or otherwise competing unfairly with Plaintiffs in any manner; 20 21 I. From using or permitting or acquiescing in the use by others of any 22 unauthorized licensing, promotional and advertising material, agreements, labels, 23 announcements, signs, and any other unauthorized items which reproduce, copy, imitate, 24 or bear the trade name “The Platters” or any other confusingly similar or derivative 25 thereof; 26 J. From asserting that either FPI or PPI have, or ever had, rights at common 27 law or otherwise in the name “The Platters;” and 28 Lewis and Roca LLP 40 North Central Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4429 -3- Case 2:10-cv-01981-JCM -RJJ Document 55 1 K. 2 Filed 05/02/11 Page 4 of 4 From effecting assignments or transfers, forming new entities or associations, or utilizing any other means for the purpose of circumventing or otherwise 3 avoiding the prohibitions of this Order. 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUGED AND DECREED that Plaintiffs Herb Reed 5 6 Enterprises, Inc., Herb Reed Enterprises, LLC and Herbert Reed are hereby permitted to seek their 7 attorneys’ fees and costs, in an amount as determined after submission of an affidavit of fees and 8 costs that complies with the provisions of Local Rule 54-16. 9 10 IT IS ALSO ORDERED, ADJUGED AND DECREED that that Jurisdiction of this case shall be retained by this Court for the purpose of enforcing this Judgment. 11 12 13 Dated: May 16, 2011 The Honorable James C. Mahan United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Lewis and Roca LLP 40 North Central Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4429 -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?