Ifil v. Bishop Corporate Solutions

Filing 24

ORDER Denying 23 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order filed by Willis Ifil. The deadlines established in the court's Scheduling Order 22 shall apply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/24/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7
8
9
10
11

WILLIS IFIL,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
BISHOP CORPORATE SOLUTIONS,
)
)
Defendant.
)
__________________________________________)

Case No. 2:10-cv-02010-JCM-PAL
ORDER

12
13

This matter is before the court on the parties’ Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order

14

(Dkt. #23) filed on October 18, 2011. On October 4, 2011, the court entered a Scheduling Order (Dkt.

15

#22) because the parties failed to submit a stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order in compliance

16

with Local Rule 26-1. The parties’ Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (Dkt. #23) requests

17

296 days to complete discovery which is substantially more time than the 180 days deemed

18

presumptively reasonable by Local Rule 26-1(e). Additionally, the parties proposed plan does not

19

comply with the requirements of LR 26-1(e) which requires that any request for special scheduling

20

review provide a statement of reasons why longer or different time periods should apply. Accordingly,

21

IT IS ORDERED Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (Dkt. #23) is not approved

22

and is DENIED, and the deadlines established in the court’s Scheduling Order (Dkt. #22) shall apply.

23

Dated this 24th day of October, 2011.

24
25
26
27
28

________________________________________
PEGGY A. LEEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE