Brodzki v. Gillispie
Filing
10
ORDER ADOPTING and AFFIRMING 5 Report and Recommendations. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court terminate this case and enter judgment in favor of Defendants. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 07/30/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
ANTHONY J. BRODZKI,
11
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:10-CV-02051-KJD-GWF
ORDER
12
v.
13
DOUG GILLISPIE, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
Before the Court for consideration is the Report & Recommendation (#5) of Magistrate
17
JudgeGeorge Foley, Jr entered May 4, 2011, recommending that this action be dismissed with
18
prejudice. Plaintiff has filed an objection (#7).
19
The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28
20
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and LR IB 3-2. Based on its review, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s
21
determination that the allegations of the complaint are fantastic, delusional and irrational. The Court
22
further agrees that it is clear from the face of the amended complaint (#4) that the deficiencies cannot
23
be cured by amendment. Plaintiff’s opposition fails to raise coherent arguments showing why the
24
Report & Recommendation should not be adopted. The Court determines that the Report &
25
Recommendation (#5) of the United States Magistrate Judge entered May 4, 2011, should be
26
ADOPTED and AFFIRMED.
1
2
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report & Recommendation
(#5) entered May 4, 2011, is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED.
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
4
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court terminate this case and entered
5
6
judgment in favor of Defendants.
DATED this 30th day of July 2012.
7
8
9
10
_____________________________
Kent J. Dawson
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?