Brodzki v. Gillispie

Filing 10

ORDER ADOPTING and AFFIRMING 5 Report and Recommendations. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court terminate this case and enter judgment in favor of Defendants. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 07/30/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 ANTHONY J. BRODZKI, 11 Plaintiff, Case No. 2:10-CV-02051-KJD-GWF ORDER 12 v. 13 DOUG GILLISPIE, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Before the Court for consideration is the Report & Recommendation (#5) of Magistrate 17 JudgeGeorge Foley, Jr entered May 4, 2011, recommending that this action be dismissed with 18 prejudice. Plaintiff has filed an objection (#7). 19 The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28 20 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and LR IB 3-2. Based on its review, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s 21 determination that the allegations of the complaint are fantastic, delusional and irrational. The Court 22 further agrees that it is clear from the face of the amended complaint (#4) that the deficiencies cannot 23 be cured by amendment. Plaintiff’s opposition fails to raise coherent arguments showing why the 24 Report & Recommendation should not be adopted. The Court determines that the Report & 25 Recommendation (#5) of the United States Magistrate Judge entered May 4, 2011, should be 26 ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. 1 2 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report & Recommendation (#5) entered May 4, 2011, is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court terminate this case and entered 5 6 judgment in favor of Defendants. DATED this 30th day of July 2012. 7 8 9 10 _____________________________ Kent J. Dawson United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?