Baltodano v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Filing
8
DISCOVERY PLAN and SCHEDULING ORDER. Discovery due by 5/23/2011. Motions due by 6/22/2011. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 7/22/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston on 12/20/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
A. J. SHARP, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 11457 PHILLIPS, SPALLAS & ANGSTADT LLC 504 South Ninth Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (702) 938-1510 Attorneys for Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA MARCELA BALTODANO and FRANCISCO BALTODANO, v. Plaintiff[s], Case No.: 2:10-cv-02062-JCM-RJJ JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER SUBMITTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH LR 26-1(e)
WAL-MART STORES, INC.; DOES 1 through 10; and ROE ENTITIES 11-20, inclusive, Defendants. Pursuant to Local Rule 26-1(e), the parties submit their proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. 1. Meeting: Pursuant to FRCP Rule 26(f), a meeting was held on December 9, 2010,
and was attended telephonically by A. J. SHARP, ESQ. of PHILLIPS SPALLAS & ANGSTADT LLC, for Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., and JOSHUA R. HARRIS, ESQ., of RICHARD HARRIS LAW FIRM, for Plaintiffs. 2. Pre-Discovery Disclosures: Pursuant to FRCP Rule 26(a)(1), the parties will make
their pre-discovery disclosures by December 23, 2010. 3. Areas of Discovery: The parties agree that the areas of discovery should include, but
not be limited to: all claims and defenses allowed pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. //
-1-
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
4.
Discovery Plan: The parties propose the following discovery plan: A. Discovery Cut-off Date(s): LR 26(e)(1) provides that "unless otherwise
ordered, discovery periods longer than one hundred eighty (180) days from the date the first defendant answers or appears will require special scheduling review." The parties agree that there is no need for a special scheduling review. Therefore, the parties agree that discovery must be
commenced and completed no later than May 23, 2011. This date is 180 days after Defendant's filing of its appearance and answer. B. Amending the Pleadings and Adding Parties: The parties shall have until
February 22, 2011, to file any motions to amend the pleadings to add parties. This is 90 days before the discovery cut-off date. C. FRCP 26(a)(2) Disclosure of Experts: Disclosure of experts shall proceed
according to FRCP Rule 26(a)(2) and LR 26-1(e)(3) as follows: The disclosure of experts and their reports shall occur on or before March 24, 2011. The disclosure of rebuttal experts and their reports shall occur on or before April 22, 2011. These deadlines are 60 and 31 days before the discovery cut-off date, respectively. D. Interim Status Report: The parties shall file the interim status report by
March 24, 2011, 60 days before the discovery cut-off date, as required by LR 26-3. E. Dispositive Motions: The parties shall have until June 22, 2011, to file
dispositive motions. This is 30 days after the discovery cut-off date, as required by LR 26-1(e)(4). // // // // //
-2-
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
F.
Pre-Trial Order: The parties will prepare a Consolidated Pre-Trial Order on
or before July 22, 2011, which is not more than 30 days after the date set for filing dispositive motions in the case, as required by LR 26-1(e)(5). This deadline will be suspended if dispositive motions are timely filed until 30 days after the decision of the dispositive motions or until further order of the Court. The disclosure required by FRCP Rule 26(a)(3), and objections thereto, shall be made in the pre-trial order. G. Court Conferences: If the Court has questions regarding the dates proposed
by the parties, the parties request a conference with the Court before entry of the Scheduling Order. If the Court does not have questions, the parties do not request a conference with the Court. H. Extensions or Modifications of the Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order:
LR 26-4 governs modifications or extensions of this Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Any stipulation or motion must be made not later than May 3, 2011, 20 days before the discovery cut-off date. I. Authorizations: It is agreed that Plaintiff MARCELA BALTODANO will
complete, sign and serve on Defendants on or before December 23, 2010, the following forms provided to Plaintiffs' counsel by Defendants' counsel: (1) Release Regarding Controlled Substance Information; (2) HIPAA Compliant Authorization for the Release of Patient Information Pursuant to 45 CFR 164.508; (3) Social Security Administration Consent for Release of Information; (4) Consent for Release of Employment Information; and (5) Request for Copy of Tax Return (for Tax Years 2004-2009). // // // //
-3-
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
J.
Format of Discovery: Pursuant to the electronic discovery amendments to
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure effective December 1, 2006, the parties addressed the ediscovery issues pertaining to the format of discovery at the Rule 26(f) conference. The parties do not anticipate discovery of native files or metadata at this time, but each party reserves the right to make a showing for the need of such electronic data as discovery progresses. K. Independent Medical Examination: Plaintiff MARCELA BALTODANO
will participate in an independent medical examination performed by Defendant's doctor, to be determined. DATED this 10th day of December, 2010. /s/ Joshua R. Harris Joshua R. Harris, Esq. RICHARD HARRIS LAW FIRM 801 South Fourth Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Marcela and Francisco Baltodano /s/ A. J. Sharp A. J. Sharp, Esq. PHILLIPS, SPALLAS & ANGSTADT, LLC 504 South Ninth Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Attorneys for Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
IT IS SO ORDERED: _____________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dec. 20, 2010 DATED:_____________________________
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?