Vignola et al v. Gilman et al

Filing 177

ORDER Denying without prejudice 159 Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 8/19/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6

***
7
8

)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
CHARLES ALFRED GILMAN, JR., et al., )
)
Defendants.
)
)
LOUIS VIGNOLA, et al.,

9
10
11
12
13
14

2:10-CV-02099-PMP-GWF
ORDER

Before the Court for consideration is Plaintiffs’ Motions in Limine (Doc. #159)

15

filed July 10, 2013. The motion is fully briefed, and contains seventeen separate

16

motions for relief relating to evidence which should be admitted at trial.

17

However, there remain at issue in this case Plaintiffs’ Amended Motion for

18

Summary Judgment (Doc. #137), Defendant Auto-Owners Insurance Company’s

19

Second Motion for Summary Judgement (Doc. #155) and Defendant Auto-Owners’

20

Motion to Bifurcate Trial (Doc. #161). Moreover, no trial date has been set in this

21

case, and will not until resolution of the foregoing motions and the filing of a Joint

22

Pretrial Order. As a result, the Court finds it premature to consider the many forms of

23

relief sought by Plaintiffs’ Motions in Limine (Doc. #159), and concludes that it is

24

appropriate to reserve addressing the arguments raised therein until after adjudication

25

of the pending motions for summary judgment and the filing of the Joint Pretrial Order

26

which may clarify and narrow the issues for trial.

1

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motions in Limine (Doc.

2

#159) is hereby DENIED without prejudice to renew the same following the filing by

3

the Parties of the Joint Pretrial Order in this case and the setting of a trial date.

4
5

DATED: August 19, 2013.

6
7
8
9

PHILIP M. PRO
United States District Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

Page 2 of 2