Vignola et al v. Gilman et al

Filing 42

ORDER Denying 36 Defendant Gilman's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 7/18/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7

***

8
9
10
11
12
13

)
LOUIS VIGNOLA, et al.,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
CHARLES ALFRED GILMAN, JR., et al., )
)
Defendants.
)
)

2:10-CV-02099-PMP-GWF
ORDER

14
15
The Court having read and considered Defendant Gilman’s Motion to Dismiss
16
Plaintiffs’ Complaint (Doc. #36), Plaintiffs’ Response in Opposition Thereto (Doc.
17
#39) and Defendant Gilman’s Reply (Doc. #41), and good cause appearing,
18
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Gilman’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’
19
Complaint (Doc. #36) is DENIED.
20
DATED: July 18, 2011.
21
22
23
24
25
26

PHILIP M. PRO
United States District Judge