Hernandez et al v. Creative Concepts, Inc. et al
Filing
203
ORDER Granting 199 Defendant's Motion for Stay of Magistrate Judge's Orders. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant NPL Construction Co. need not produce the redacted documents on or before 03/27/2013 as directed by the Magistrate Judges 194 Order, pending review of the Magistrate Judges decision and further order of the Court. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 03/26/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
***
)
GABRIEL HERNANDEZ, RODOLFO
)
NAVA, IVAN MADRIGAL,
)
FRANCISCO CASTILLO, JOEL ROSA )
DE JESUS, JUAN CARLOS
)
NAVARRETE, JUAN JOSE ACOSTA
)
FLORES, ISMAEL AMPARAN-COBOS, )
EFREN RUANO, JUAN PALOMERA,
)
OCTAVIO ANCHONDO, ARNOLDO
)
RODRIGUEZ, and JESUS ANCHONDO, )
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
CREATIVE CONCEPTS, INC.; SPEIDEL )
ENTERPRISES, INC.; JOHN SPEIDEL, )
PAUL SCHELLY; NORTHERN
)
PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION CO.; and )
NPL CONSTRUCTION CO.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
ORDER
2:10-CV-02132-PMP-LRL
Having read and considered Defendant NPL Construction Co.’s Emergency
20
21
Motion for Stay of Magistrate Judge’s Orders (Doc. #199), and good cause appearing to
22
maintain the status quo pending review in light of the attorney-client privilege asserted over
23
the documents ordered to be released to Plaintiffs,
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant NPL Construction Co.’s Emergency Motion for
24
25
Stay of Magistrate Judge’s Orders (Doc. #199) is hereby GRANTED.
26
///
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant NPL Construction Co. need not
2
produce the redacted documents on or before March 27, 2013 as directed by the Magistrate
3
Judge’s March 18, 2013 Order (Doc. #194), pending review of the Magistrate Judge’s
4
decision and further order of the Court.
5
6
DATED: March 26, 2013
7
8
9
_______________________________
PHILIP M. PRO
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?