Hernandez et al v. Creative Concepts, Inc. et al

Filing 230

ORDER that 229 Motion for Clarification of Order of April 5, 2013 is GRANTED in that Defendant NPL Construction Co.'s production to other parties of the documents compelled to be produced by and listed in the Orders at Docket Nos. 190 and 1 94 as well as the Order at Docket No. 223 shall not constitute a waiver by Defendant NPL Construction Co. of its objection that the documents produced are covered by the attorney-client privilege and/or work product doctrine as claimed by Defendant NPL Construction Co. in this case. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 4/9/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

***
)
GABRIEL HERNANDEZ, RODOLFO
)
NAVA, IVAN MADRIGAL,
)
FRANCISCO CASTILLO, JOEL ROSA )
DE JESUS, JUAN CARLOS
)
NAVARRETE, JUAN JOSE ACOSTA
)
FLORES, ISMAEL AMPARAN-COBOS, )
EFREN RUANO, JUAN PALOMERA,
)
OCTAVIO ANCHONDO, ARNOLDO
)
RODRIGUEZ, and JESUS ANCHONDO, )
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
CREATIVE CONCEPTS, INC.; SPEIDEL )
ENTERPRISES, INC.; JOHN SPEIDEL, )
PAUL SCHELLY; NORTHERN
)
PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION CO.; and )
NPL CONSTRUCTION CO.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)

ORDER

2:10-CV-02132-PMP-LRL

Having read and considered Defendant NPL Construction Co.’s Emergency
Motion for Clarification of Order of April 5, 2013 (Doc. #229), and good cause appearing,

22

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant NPL Construction Co.’s Emergency Motion for

23

Clarification of Order of April 5, 2013 (Doc. #229) is hereby GRANTED in that Defendant

24

NPL Construction Co.’s production to other parties of the documents compelled to be

25

produced by and listed in the Orders at Docket Nos. 190 and 194 as well as the Order at

26

Docket No. 223 shall not constitute a waiver by Defendant NPL Construction Co. of its

1

objection that the documents produced are covered by the attorney-client privilege and/or

2

work product doctrine as claimed by Defendant NPL Construction Co. in this case.

3
4

DATED: April 9, 2013

5
6
7

_______________________________
PHILIP M. PRO
United States District Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2