Hernandez et al v. Creative Concepts, Inc. et al

Filing 67

ORDER that Defendant Southwest Gas Corporations Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint 49 and Defendant Southwest Gas Corporations Demand for Security of Costs 50 are DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 11/1/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

GABRIEL HERNANDEZ, RODOLFO
NAVA, IVAN MADRIGAL,
FRANCISCO CASTILLO, JOEL
ROSA DE JESUS, JUAN CARLOS
NAVARRETE, JUAN JOSE ACOSTA
FLORES, ISMAEL AMPARANCOBOS, EFERN RUANO, JUAN
PALOMERA, OCTAVIO
ANCHONDO, ARNOLDO
RODRIGUEZ AND JESUS
ANCHONDO,
Plaintiffs,

13
14

vs.

15

CREATIVE CONCEPTS, INC.,
NORTHERN PIPELINE
CONSTRUCTION CO., NPL
CONSTRUCTION CO., SPEIDEL
ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a
CREATIVE CONCEPTS, JOHN
SPEIDEL, AND PAUL SCHELLY
d/b/a LAW OFFICES OF PAUL
SCHELLY,

16
17
18
19
20

Defendants.

21

***
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

2:10-CV-02132-PMP-LRL
ORDER

22

Defendant Southwest Corporation having been dismissed as a party

23
24

Defendant in this case on October 17, 2011, (Doc. #62), and good cause appearing,

25

///

26

///

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Southwest Gas Corporation’s Motion to

1
2

Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (Doc. #49) and Defendant

3

Southwest Gas Corporation’s Demand for Security of Costs (Doc. #50) are DENIED

4

as moot.

5
6

DATED: November 1, 2011.

7
8
9

PHILIP M. PRO
United States District Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2