Federal Trade Commision v. Johnson et al

Filing 1080

ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 1075 Motion Regarding Issue Raised in 998 Motion for Clarification filed by the Todd Vowell Parties. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/12/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 *** 10 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 Case No. 2:10-cv-02203-MMD-GWF ORDER (Receiver’s Emergency Motion – dkt. no. 1075) v. JEREMY JOHNSON, et al., Defendants. 14 15 16 17 Before the Court is the Receiver’s Emergency Motion Regarding Issue Raised in 18 Motion for Clarification Filed by the Todd Vowell Parties. (See dkt. no. 1075.) Good 19 cause appearing, the Receiver’s Emergency Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in 20 part. The Receiver and the FTC have seven (7) days from the date of this Order to file a 21 supplement to the Vowell Parties’ Emergency Motion for Clarification of Order. (See dkt. 22 no. 998.) The supplement is to address the following issues in the context of pertinent 23 receivership law: 24 1. Preliminary Injunction. 25 26 The use of unsecured credit to pay attorneys’ fees in light of the 2. The due diligence required by counsel in evaluating the source and nature 27 of payments received in circumstances involving an asset freeze and 28 receivership. 1 The Vowell Entities will have seven (7) days thereafter to file their Response to this 2 supplement. No reply brief is to be filed. All briefs are limited to ten (10) pages in length. 3 DATED THIS 12th day of June 2013. 4 5 MIRANDA M. DU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?