Rivard-Crook et al v. Accelerated Payment Technologies, Inc.
Filing
206
ORDER Granting 203 Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Motion to Remove Counsel of Record. Attorneys Madeline L DiCicco and Lance W Johns terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 04/01/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
BARBARA RIVARD-CROOK; et al.,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
ACCELERATED PAYMENT TECHNOLOGIES, )
INC.,
)
)
Defendant.
)
__________________________________________)
Case No. 2:10-cv-02215-MMD-GWF
Consolidated with:
2:11-cv-00986-MMD-GWF
2:12-cv-00003-MMD-GWF
2:12-cv-00776-MMD-GWF
ORDER
Ex Parte Motion to Remove Counsel
of Record (#203)
13
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Ex Parte Motion to Remove Counsel of
14
Record (#203) filed on March 25, 2014. Mr. Charles Robert Peterson, Esq., represents that Lance
15
W. Johns and Madeline L. DiCicco, attorneys with the law firm Johns & Durrant LLP, no longer
16
represent Plaintiffs Todd Grant, Steve Gautier, Terry Conners, Neil Maglaya, Ryan Brennan, and
17
Larry Bright in this matter. Thus, Plaintiffs request that Mr. Johns’ and Ms. DiCicco’s names be
18
removed as counsel of record for the aforementioned Plaintiffs.
19
The Court finds the movant substantially establishes good cause for the withdrawal.
20
Attorneys Charles Robert Peterson and Neil B. Durrant will continue to represent the named
21
Plaintiffs. Furthermore, under Local Rule 7-2(d), the failure of an opposing party to file points and
22
authorities in response to any motion shall constitute a consent to the granting of the motion. The
23
time to oppose the instant Motion has expired, and no opposition has been filed. Accordingly,
24
25
26
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Ex Parte Motion to Remove Counsel of
Record (#203) is granted.
DATED this 1st day of April, 2014.
27
28
______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?