Manteris v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Filing 50

ORDER that a temporary protective order is entered. Plaintiff has until 7/21/11 in which to respond to 47 First MOTION to Quash Subpoena filed by KMart Corporation, 48 MOTION for Protective Order filed by KMart Corporation, 45 Emergenc y MOTION to Quash Subpoena filed by Walgreen Co., and 43 Emergency MOTION to Quash Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition and for a Protective Order filed by Target Corporation. The Non-Parties have until 7/28/11 in which to file a reply. A hearing on the motions is set for 8/4/2011 09:30 AM in LV Courtroom 3B before Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 7/7/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 9 10 11 KELLY MANTERIS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) WAL-MART STORES, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:11-cv-00045-PMP-PAL ORDER (Mtns to Quash - Dkt. ##43, 45, 47, 48) 12 13 This matter is before the court on Non-Party Target Corporation’s Emergency Motion to Quash 14 Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition and for Protective Order (Dkt. #43) filed July 6, 2011; Non-Party 15 Walgreen Co.’s Emergency Motion to Quash Subpoena (Dkt. #45) filed July 7, 2011; and Non-Party K- 16 Mart Corporation’s Motion to Quash Subpoena (Dkt. #47) and Motion for a Protective Order (Dkt. 17 #48), filed July 7, 2011. 18 Each motion seeks a protective order and to quash subpoenas issued by Plaintiff’s counsel on 19 July 6, 2011, which direct the movants to designate a corporate representative to appear and testify 20 concerning the entryway carpeting at their respective stores. The movants each request the court hear 21 their motions on an expedited basis because the depositions are set on July 8, 2011. 22 Having reviewed and considered the matter, 23 IT IS ORDERED: 24 1. A temporary protective order is entered precluding the depositions noticed by Plaintiff’s 25 counsel from going forward on July 8, 2011, pending a decision on the merits of the 26 motions. 27 2. Plaintiff has until July 21, 2011, in which to respond to the Non-Parties’ motions. 28 3. The Non-Parties have until July 28, 2011, in which to reply. 1 4. A hearing on the motions is set August 4, 2011, at 9:30 a.m. 2 Dated this 7th day of July, 2011. 3 4 5 ________________________________________ PEGGY A. LEEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?