Manteris v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Filing 50

ORDER that a temporary protective order is entered. Plaintiff has until 7/21/11 in which to respond to 47 First MOTION to Quash Subpoena filed by KMart Corporation, 48 MOTION for Protective Order filed by KMart Corporation, 45 Emergenc y MOTION to Quash Subpoena filed by Walgreen Co., and 43 Emergency MOTION to Quash Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition and for a Protective Order filed by Target Corporation. The Non-Parties have until 7/28/11 in which to file a reply. A hearing on the motions is set for 8/4/2011 09:30 AM in LV Courtroom 3B before Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 7/7/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7
8
9
10
11

KELLY MANTERIS,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
WAL-MART STORES, INC., et al.,
)
)
Defendants. )
__________________________________________)

Case No. 2:11-cv-00045-PMP-PAL
ORDER
(Mtns to Quash - Dkt. ##43, 45, 47, 48)

12
13

This matter is before the court on Non-Party Target Corporation’s Emergency Motion to Quash

14

Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition and for Protective Order (Dkt. #43) filed July 6, 2011; Non-Party

15

Walgreen Co.’s Emergency Motion to Quash Subpoena (Dkt. #45) filed July 7, 2011; and Non-Party K-

16

Mart Corporation’s Motion to Quash Subpoena (Dkt. #47) and Motion for a Protective Order (Dkt.

17

#48), filed July 7, 2011.

18

Each motion seeks a protective order and to quash subpoenas issued by Plaintiff’s counsel on

19

July 6, 2011, which direct the movants to designate a corporate representative to appear and testify

20

concerning the entryway carpeting at their respective stores. The movants each request the court hear

21

their motions on an expedited basis because the depositions are set on July 8, 2011.

22

Having reviewed and considered the matter,

23

IT IS ORDERED:

24

1.

A temporary protective order is entered precluding the depositions noticed by Plaintiff’s

25

counsel from going forward on July 8, 2011, pending a decision on the merits of the

26

motions.

27

2.

Plaintiff has until July 21, 2011, in which to respond to the Non-Parties’ motions.

28

3.

The Non-Parties have until July 28, 2011, in which to reply.

1

4.

A hearing on the motions is set August 4, 2011, at 9:30 a.m.

2

Dated this 7th day of July, 2011.

3
4
5

________________________________________
PEGGY A. LEEN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2