Lalwani et al v. Nevada Association Services Inc et al

Filing 39

ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part 32 MOTION for Sanctions or in the Alternative Motion to Compel. Wells Fargo's request for any additional sanctions is DENIED, and any request for relief not specifically addressed in this order is DE NIED. See Order for details. FURTHER ORDERED that 36 Emergency MOTION to Extend Time Dispositive Motion Deadline is GRANTED to the extent that Defendants shall have 30 days from decision of the pending dispositive motions to file any additional dispositive motions not already adjudicated in their pending motions to dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 8/26/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

KAMAL P. LALWANI, et al.,

)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
NEVADA ASSOCIATION SERVICES, INC.,
)
et al.,
)
)
Defendants. )
__________________________________________)

Case No. 2:11-cv-00084-KJD-PAL
ORDER

The court conducted a hearing on August 23, 2011, on Defendant Wells Fargo’s Motion for

14

Sanctions or in the Alternative Motion to Compel (Dkt. #32), and Defendant Wells Fargo and MERS

15

Corp., Inc.’s Emergency Motion to Extend Dispositive Motion Deadline (Dkt. #36). The Plaintiffs

16

received notice of the hearing but did not appear. Robin Perkins appeared on behalf of Defendants

17

Wells Fargo and MERS Corp.

18

The Complaint in this case was filed in stated court and removed (Dkt. #1) January 18, 2011.

19

Defendants MERS Corp., Inc. and Mortgage Electric Reg. Sys., Inc. responded to the complaint by

20

filing a Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #6) January 25, 2011. Defendant Wells Fargo also filed a Motion to

21

Dismiss (Dkt. #8) January 25, 2011. Both motions to dismiss have been fully briefed and are under

22

submission to the district judge.

23

Wells Fargo’s Motion for Sanctions or in the Alternative Motion to Compel (Dkt. #32) seeks

24

sanctions and an order compelling the Plaintiffs to respond to a first set of request for production of

25

documents served June 8, 2011. The motion also seeks an order compelling the Plaintiffs to appear for

26

their deposition. Counsel for Wells Fargo noticed both Plaintiffs’ deposition for July 1, 2011, and

27

attempted to contact the Plaintiffs telephonically June 27, 2011, to remind them about their deposition.

28

However, the person answering the phone indicated the Plaintiffs were not at home. Plaintiffs did not

1

appear for their depositions. Plaintiffs have also not responded to the requests for production of

2

documents, requested an extension of time to respond, or responded to multiple efforts by counsel for

3

Wells Fargo to obtain this discovery without the court’s intervention.

4

Defendant’s Emergency Motion to Extend Dispositive Motion Deadline (Dkt. #36) points out

5

that two dispositive motions are under submission to the district judge. The court’s Discovery Plan and

6

Scheduling Order (Dkt. #29) established an August 10, 2011 deadline for filing dispositive motions.

7

Defendants request a 60-day extension to file dispositive motions to allow the pending dispositive

8

motions and issues raised in those motions to be determined before any additional dispositive motions

9

are filed.

10

Plaintiffs did not oppose the motions, request an extension of time to do so, or appear for the

11

hearing of which they received notice by mail. The court waited ten minutes past the scheduled hearing

12

time to call the matter. LR 7-2(d) provides, in pertinent part that “[t]he failure of an opposing party to

13

file points and authorities in response to any motion shall constitute a consent to the granting of the

14

motion.”

15

Having reviewed and considered the matter and for good cause shown,

16

IT IS ORDERED that:

17

1.

Defendant Wells Fargo’s Motion for Sanctions or in the Alternative Motion to Compel

18

(Dkt. #32) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

19

a.

The motion is granted to the extent that Plaintiffs shall have until September 6,

20

2011, to serve full and complete responses to Defendant Wells Fargo’s requests

21

for production served June 8, 2011. Failure to timely comply with this order will

22

result in sanctions, up to and including a recommendation that Plaintiffs’

23

complaint be dismissed for failure to meet their discovery obligations and failure

24

to comply with the court’s order.

25

b.

Plaintiffs shall make themselves available to appear for deposition no later than

26

September 27, 2011. Failure to appear for their duly-noticed depositions will

27

result in the imposition of sanctions up to and including a recommendation that

28

Plaintiffs’ complaint be dismissed for failure to meet their discovery obligations
2

1
2

and failure to comply with the court’s order.
2.

3
4

Wells Fargo’s request for any additional sanctions is DENIED, and any request for relief
not specifically address in this order is DENIED.

3.

Defendants’ Emergency Motion to Extend Dispositive Motion Deadline (Dkt. #36) is

5

GRANTED to the extent that Defendants shall have 30 days from decision of the

6

pending dispositive motions to file any additional dispositive motions not already

7

adjudicated in their pending motions to dismiss.

8

Dated this 26rd day of August, 2011.

9
10
11

______________________________________
Peggy A. Leen
United States Magistrate Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3