Cox v. Neven et al

Filing 42

ORDER Denying 36 Motion for Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston on 12/7/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7

***

8
9
10
11
12

MICHAEL STEVE COX,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
DWIGHT NEVEN, et al.,
)
)
Defendant.
)
__________________________________________)

2:11-cv-0103-KJD-RJJ

ORDER

13
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Scheduling Order (#36).
14
The Court having reviewed the Motion (#36) and the file herein finds that Plaintiff is
15
pursuing an appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals regarding an earlier order in this case.
16
Therefore, no discovery is warranted at this time. Based on the foregoing and good cause
17
appearing therefore,
18
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Scheduling Order (#36) is
19
DENIED.
20
DATED this 7th day of December, 2011.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ROBERT J. JOHNSTON
United States Magistrate Judge