Cox v. Neven et al

Filing 9

ORDER Denying 7 Motion for Discovery, "In Camera" of 4-Unserved Defendants to Affect Timely Service of Process Alternative Defense Counsel Accept Service Without Prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston on 3/7/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

-RJJ Cox v. Neven et al

Doc. 9

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 *** 9 MICHAEL STEVE COX, 10 Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 DWIGHT NEVEN, et al., 13 Defendant, 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ROBERT J. JOHNSTON United States Magistrate Judge ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:11-cv-103-KJD-RJJ

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Sealed Motion for Discovery (#7). The Court having reviewed the Sealed Motion (#7) and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Sealed Motion for Discovery (#7) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pending a screening of the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A . DATED this 7th day of March, 2011.

Dockets.Justia.com