Ingram v. Sky Security Services et al

Filing 18

ORDER Granting 15 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 4/17/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6

***
7

ANDRE M. INGRAM,
8

Plaintiff,

9
10

vs.

11

SKY SECURITY SERVICES, et al.,

12

Defendants.
13

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

2:11-CV-00139-PMP-PAL

ORDER

14
15

Plaintiff has failed to timely respond to Defendants’ Motion for Summary

16

Judgment (Doc. #15), and therefore, under the Local Rules of this Court, consents to the

17

granting of the Motion. Moreover, a review of Defendants’ Motion shows Defendant is

18

entitled to the relief requested on the merits.

19

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to for Summary

20

Judgment (Doc. #15) is GRANTED and that the Clerk of Court shall forthwith enter

21

judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff.

22

DATED: April 17, 2012.

23
24
25
26

PHILIP M. PRO
United States District Judge