Closson et al v. Recontrust Company et al

Filing 44

ORDERED that Plaintiffs' complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; FURTHER ORDERED that any lis pendens filed in conjunction with this action is hereby CANCELED, DISCHARGED, and EXPUNGED; FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk enter JUDGMENT for Defendants and against Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 4/10/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 SUSAN CLOSSON, et al., 11 Plaintiffs, 12 v. 13 Case No. 2:11-CV-00146-KJD-RJJ RECONTRUST COMPANY, et al., 14 ORDER Defendants. 15 16 On March 15, 2012, the Court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, but 17 granted Plaintiffs leave to amend the complaint. Plaintiffs’ amended complaint was due no later than 18 March 30, 2012. Though the time for doing so has passed, Plaintiffs have failed to file an amended 19 complaint. 20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that in accordance with the Court’s Order (#42), 21 Plaintiffs’ complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief 22 can be granted; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any lis pendens filed in conjunction with this action is 23 24 hereby CANCELED, DISCHARGED, and EXPUNGED; 25 /// 26 1 2 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter JUDGMENT for Defendants and against Plaintiffs. DATED this 10th day of April 2012. 4 5 6 7 _____________________________ Kent J. Dawson United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?