Pettit v. Pulte Mortgage LLC et al

Filing 58

ORDER Denying 54 Motion for More Definite Statement. Plaintiff shall file a Response to the 47 Motion to Dismiss by 2/15/2012. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/27/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3
4
5

ELLERY J. PETTIT,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
vs.

6

PULTE MORTGAGE LLC, et al.
7
8

Defendants.

Case No.: 2:11-cv-00149-GMN-PAL
ORDER

9
10

Before the Court is Plaintiff Ellery J. Pettit’s Motion for a More Definite Statement under

11

Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(e). (ECF No. 54). Plaintiff claims that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF

12

No. 47) is vague and ambiguous because it is filed by IBM LBPS and MERS. IBM LBPS has

13

already been dismissed as a party to this suit. Therefore, Plaintiff claims that the Motion to

14

Dismiss is vague and ambiguous. STERUS, INC. and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems

15

filed an ERRATA to the Motion to Dismiss that clarifies that they are the Defendants that filed

16

the Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 57). Therefore there should no longer be any confusion as to

17

who is filing the Motion to Dismiss.

18

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion (ECF No. 54) is DENIED. Plaintiff

19

shall file a Response to the Motion to Dismiss by February 15, 2012. Failure to do so will result

20

in dismissal of this suit.

21

DATED this 27th day of January, 2012.

22
23
24
25

________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro
United States District Judge