BAC Home Loans Servicing LP v. Stonefield II Homeowners Association et al

Filing 130

ORDER Granting 56 Motion to Dismiss. The case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/21/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 8 BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, 9 10 11 12 13 2:11-CV-167 JCM (RJJ) Plaintiff, v. STONEFIELD II HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, et al., Defendants. 14 15 ORDER 16 Presently before the court is defendants Southern Highlands Community Association and 17 Alessi & Koenig, LLC’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) 18 under Nevada Revised Statute § 38.310, or in the alternative, motion to compel arbitration. (Doc. 19 #56). Defendants Canyon Crest Association and Las Brisas Homeowners Association filed limited 20 joinders to the motion. (Doc. #68 and #104). Plaintiff BAC Home Loan Servicing, LP filed an 21 opposition. (Doc. #118). Defendants Southern Highlands Community Association and Alessi & 22 Koenig, LLC, filed a reply in support of the motion. (Doc. #120). 23 Plaintiff BAC Home Loan filed its complaint on January 31, 2011, requesting declaratory 24 and injunctive relief. (Doc. #1). According to the complaint, BAC Home Loan services thousands 25 of mortgage loans in Nevada on behalf of many holders of first deeds of trust, or “first security 26 interests” for purposes of NRS § 116.3116. Id. It asserts that many of the properties it services are 27 subject to the liens of homeowners’ associations. Id. Such liens arise when the homeowners’ 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge 1 associations’ fees go unpaid by the homeowner. Id. Pursuant to NRS § 116.3116, the associations 2 may impose a lien for “any penalties, fees, charges, late charges, fines and interest charged.” NRS 3 § 116.3116(1)(j)-(n). BAC Home Loan contends that the associations’ liens become senior to it only 4 “to the extent of the assessments for common expenses based on the periodic budget adopted by the 5 association pursuant to NRS 116.3116 which would have become due in the absence of acceleration 6 during the 9 months immediately preceding institution of an action to enforce the lien.” Id. 7 BAC Home Loan contends that if the amount owed for association assessment fees is not 8 paid before the foreclosure sale, it tenders payments to the associations to “clear the cloud” on the 9 title. Here, it asserts that it attempted to tender the amounts owed, but that “[s]everal trustees of 10 homeowners’ associations, including the trustee [d]efendants, have wrongfully rejected [its] tender.” 11 It asks the court to declare that (1) it has the right to pay-off or redeem an association’s super-priority 12 lien, and (2) that only budgeted common assessments, but not attorneys’ fees or collections costs, 13 are included within the super-priority lien amount under NRS 11.3116. Further, plaintiff asks this 14 court for an injunction forcing the defendants to accept payment for only the super-priority amount, 15 excluding any additional fees or costs. 16 Motion To Dismiss 17 In the present motion to dismiss (doc. #56), defendants contend that this court lacks subject 18 matter jurisdiction because this action should be submitted to arbitration pursuant to NRS 38.320. 19 Under that section of the Nevada Revised Statute, “[a]ny civil action described in NRS 20 38.310 must be submitted for mediation or arbitration by filing a written claim with the [d]ivision.” 21 Section 38.310 provides that “[n]o civil action based upon a claim relating to:...(b) [t]he procedures 22 used for increasing, decreasing or imposing additional assessments upon residential property, may 23 be commenced in any court in this [s]tate unless the action has been submitted to meditation or 24 arbitration pursuant to the provisions of NRS 38.300 to 38.360, inclusive, and, if the civil action 25 concerns real estate within a planned community subject to provisions of chapter 116 of NRS...” 26 NRS § 38.310(1)(b). Additionally, subsection 2 of that same statute states that the “court shall 27 dismiss any civil action which is commenced in violation of the provisions of subsection 1.” NRS 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge -2- 1 § 38.310(2). 2 According to the definitions provided in NRS 38.300(1), “assessments” means “(a) [a]ny 3 charge which an association may impose against an owner of residential property pursuant to a 4 declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions, including any late charges, interest and costs 5 of collecting the charges; and (b) [a]ny penalties, fines, fees and other charges which may be 6 imposed by an association...” Further, in section (3), “civil action” is defined as including “an action 7 for money damages or equitable relief...,” but excluding “an action in equity for injunctive relief in 8 which there is an immediate threat of irreparable harm, or an action relating to the title to residential 9 property.” NRS § 38.300(3). 10 Here, as discussed above, the case stems from the plaintiff attempting to pay-off the 11 association “assessment” fees owed to the association prior to the foreclosure sale. However, 12 defendants have refused to accept tender, because they allege that they are entitled to “additional 13 assessments” in the form of attorney’s “fees” and the “costs of collecting” the association fees. 14 Defendants contend that this action fits squarely within the definitions provided in NRS 38.300(1)(a) 15 and (b) and (2) and § 38.310(1)(b), warranting dismissal. In the alternative, defendants suggest that 16 the court should stay the proceedings and compel arbitration. 17 Plaintiff BAC Home Loan argues in its opposition (doc. #118), that arbitration is not required 18 and defendants are interpreting the statutes incorrectly. Specifically, plaintiff asserts that (1) “§ 19 38.300(3)’s definition of a “civil action,” as that term is used in [NRS] § 38.310, includes a claim 20 for monetary damages or equitable relief; the definition excludes claims for declaratory relief,” and 21 (2) “[NRS] § 38.310's legislative history shows that Nevada’s legislature never intended to compel 22 a senior lien holder like BAC to arbitrate a dispute concerning the statutory interpretation of the 23 Uniform Common Interest Ownership Act,” but was intended “to compel community residents and 24 the board to resolve their disputes through arbitration or mediation.” 25 BAC Home Loan interprets NRS 38.300(3), the definition of “civil action,” as excluding 26 actions for declaratory relief, such as this, simply because declaratory relief is not specifically listed 27 in the definition. Further, it argues that a request for the remedy of injunctive relief, such as that 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge -3- 1 sought here, is not encompassed in the definition either. To rebut this, defendants contend that the 2 statute specifically set out what actions, i.e. injunctive relief with irreparable injury or those relating 3 to the title of the property, were excluded, and did not list declaratory relief. Defendants argue that 4 had it been the intention of the statute to exclude declaratory relief actions, it would have clearly 5 been listed. 6 Plaintiff BAC Home Loan asserts that if the court finds the language of the statute is unclear 7 or ambiguous, the legislative history demonstrates the intention of the statute was to settle disputes 8 between homeowners and associations through arbitration and mediation. The court, however, need 9 not look at the legislative history or read into the intent of the drafters, the statutes are clear. 10 The relevant statutes demonstrate that (1) “claims relating to” “increasing, decreasing or 11 imposing additional assessments upon residential property” must be submitted to arbitration first, 12 (2) “costs of collecting the charges” and “[a]ny penalties, fines, fees and other charges which may 13 be imposed by an association...” are within the definition of “assessment,” and (3) civil actions for 14 “monetary damages or equitable relief” must be dismissed. NRS § 38.320(1), § 38.310(1)(b) and 15 (2), and § 38.300(1)(a) and (b) and (3). As the complaint here arises from the defendants’ increasing 16 the amount of the assessments due to attorneys’ fees and the costs in collecting the fees, the plaintiff 17 was required to submit the claim to arbitration or mediation first. Id. Therefore, the court is inclined 18 to dismiss the action without prejudice to allow the plaintiff to submit its claims to arbitration or 19 mediation. 20 Accordingly, 21 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED that defendants Southern 22 Highlands Community Association and Alessi & Koenig, LLC’s motion to dismiss pursuant to 23 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) under Nevada Revised Statute § 38.310, or in the 24 alternative, motion to compel arbitration (doc. #56) be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. 25 ... 26 ... 27 ... 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge -4- 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the case of BAC Home Loans Servicing LP v. Stonefield 2 II Homeowners Association et al (Case No. 2:11-cv-00167-JCM -RJJ) be, and the same hereby is, 3 DISMISSED without prejudice. 4 DATED July 21, 2011. 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge -5-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?