Turner v. Nozero et al

Filing 26

ORDER that Plaintiffs Motion for More Time 24 is DENIED. Plaintiff shall have to and including March 12, 2012 within which to file her response in opposition to Defendants Motion to Dismiss (21]. Failure to do so will result in Court granting Defendants Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 2/27/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6

***

7

ANNETTE L. TURNER,
8

Plaintiff,
9

vs.
10

ELIZABETH NOZERO, et al.,
11

Defendants.
12
13

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

2:11-CV-00190-PMP-PAL
ORDER

Having read and considered Plaintiff’s Motion for More Time (Doc. #24)

14

filed February 22, 2012, and Defendants’ Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. #25)

15

filed February 23, 2012, and it appearing therefrom that Plaintiff has had

16

exceptional extensions of time within which to retain counsel to represent her in this

17

matter, and appears unable to do so, and good cause appearing,

18
19
20

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for More Time (Doc. #24) is
DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have to and including

21

March 12, 2012 within which to file her response in opposition to Defendants’

22

Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #21). Failure to do so will result in Court granting

23

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.

24

DATED: February 27, 2012.

25
26

PHILIP M. PRO
United States District Judge