Tyson v. Mid-Century Insurance Company

Filing 28

ORDER that the 21 Motion for Summary Judgment does not fall within the category that requires expedited disposition and will therefore be decided in the order of pending motions in civil cases. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 11/14/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6

***

7

YOLANDA TYSON,

Case No. 2:11-cv-00199-MMD-RJJ
Plaintiff,

8
v.

ORDER

9
10
11

MID-CENTURY INSURANCE
COMPANY,
Defendant.

12
13

Before the Court is Defendant Mid-Century Insurance Company’s application for a

14

status check as to the disposition of its Motion for Summary Judgment (dkt. no. 21)

15

pursuant to Local Rule 7-6(b). (Dkt. no. 27.)

16

filed on June 13, 2012, and was ripe and fully submitted to the Court on August 3, 2012.

17

The Court disposes of pending civil motions in chronological order, except for those

18

motions that require disposition on an expedited basis. The Court has several pending

19

motions remaining from the period before March 31, 2012, and will be moving

20

chronologically to motions filed through April 2012. The Motion for Summary Judgment

21

does not fall within the category that requires expedited disposition and will therefore be

22

decided in the order of pending motions in civil cases. Oral argument will be scheduled if

23

the Court determines argument is necessary.

The Motion for Summary Judgment was

24
25

DATED THIS 14th day of November 2012.

26
27
28

MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE