Rodriguez v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Filing 29

ORDER DISMISSING CASE with Prejudice re: 28 Stipulation for Dismissal. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/9/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 A. J. SHARP, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 11457 PHILLIPS, SPALLAS & ANGSTADT LLC 504 South Ninth Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (702) 938-1510 Attorneys for Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 DELORES RODRIGUEZ, 10 11 12 13 Case No.: 2:11-cv-00207-JCM-CWH STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., a Foreign Corporation, and JOHN DOES I through X, inclusive, 14 Defendants. 15 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by the parties hereto, through their respective 16 counsel of record, that the above-captioned matter be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear that 17 18 // 19 // 20 // 21 // 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 26 27 28 -1- Case 2:11-cv-00207-JCM -CWH Document 28 1 party’s own costs and attorney’s fees. 2 DATED this 8th day of May, 2012. Filed 05/08/12 Page 2 of 2 3 4 5 6 7 DATED this 8th day of May, 2012. LAW OFFICE OF VICTOR LEE MILLER PHILLIPS, SPALLAS & ANGSTADT /s/ Victor Lee Miller /s/ A. J. Sharp Victor Lee Miller, Esq. 935 South Decatur Boulevard Las Vegas, NV 89107 Attorney for Plaintiff Delores Rodriguez A. J. Sharp, Esq. 504 South Ninth Street Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Attorneys for Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc 8 9 10 11 ORDER PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, through their respective counsel, 12 13 14 15 16 it is hereby: ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that the above-captioned matter be dismissed, with prejudice, each party to bear that party’s own costs and attorney’s fees. May 9, 2012. DATED this ____ day of ____________________, 2012. 17 18 U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?