Amichia v. Polley et al

Filing 4

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Clerk to enter Judgment. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 4/4/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

Download PDF
-RJJ Amichia v. Polley et al Doc. 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 FRANK AMICHIA, 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 On February 9, 2011, plaintiff submitted a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (docket # 1-1). On February 10, 2011, the court issued an order denying plaintiff's incomplete application to proceed in forma pauperis and directing plaintiff to file a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee within thirty (30) days of entry of the order (docket #2). The order was served on plaintiff at his address of record. On February 18, 2011, that order was returned by the U.S. Postal Service as undeliverable. Pursuant to Rule 2-2 of the Local Rules of Special Proceedings and Appeals, a pro se litigant is required to keep the court apprised of his or her current address at all times. Local Rule 2-2 states: "The plaintiff shall immediately file with the court written notification of any change of address. The notification must include proof of service upon each opposing party or the party's attorney. Failure vs. BONNIE POLLEY, et al., Defendants. Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) / 2:11-cv-00221-KJD-RJJ ORDER Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 to comply with this rule may result in dismissal of the action with prejudice." Accordingly, as plaintiff has failed to file written notification of change of address with the court, this action is dismissed. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. April 4th DATED this _____ day of ______________________________, 2011. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?