Davis v. Clark County, et al
ORDER that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to comply with the courts order to pay the filing fee. Plaintiffs motion for leave to file exhibit A under seal 2 is DENIED as moot. Clerk to enter Judgment. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 3/31/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
-PAL Davis v. Clark County, et al
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 On February 15, 2011, this court issued an order denying plaintiff's application to 16 proceed in forma pauperis and directing plaintiff to pay the filing fee in full within thirty days of entry 17 of the order (docket #3). Plaintiff was expressly warned that failure to pay the filing fee would result 18 in the dismissal of this action. The order was served on plaintiff at his address of record 19 More than the allotted time has elapsed, and plaintiff has not responded to the court in 20 any manner. Accordingly, this action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with the 21 court's order to pay the filing fee. 22 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice 23 for failure to comply with the court's order to pay the filing fee. 24 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to file exhibit A under 25 seal (docket #2) is DENIED as moot. 26 vs. COUNTY OF CLARK, et al., Defendants. JAMES ANTHONY DAVIS, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) / UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly and close this case.
DATED this 31st day of March, 2011.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?