Buchanan v. Raschke et al
Filing
6
ORDER that Plaintiff shall file his Certificate as to Interested Parties, which fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than March 10, 2011. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 2/28/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
-GWF Buchanan v. Raschke et al
Doc. 6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ______________________________________ GEORGE FOLEY, JR. United States Magistrate Judge JAMES JEFFREY BUCHANAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE ) DEPARTMENT, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Case No. 2:11-cv-00271-RCJ-GWF ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's failure to file a Certificate as to Interested Parties as required by LR 7.1-1. The Complaint (#1) in this matter was filed February 17, 2011. LR 7.1-1 requires that counsel for private parties shall, upon entering a case, file a certificate as to interested parties, listing all persons, firms, partnerships or corporations, known to have an interest in the outcome of the case, including the names of all parent subsidiary, affiliate and/or insider of the named non-individual parties. If there are no known interested parties, other than those participating in the case, a statement to that effect must be filed. To date, Plaintiff has failed to comply. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file his Certificate as to Interested Parties, which fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than March 10, 2011. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. DATED this 28th day of February, 2011.
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?