Federal Trade Commission v. Ivy Capital, Inc. et al

Filing 175

ORDER Denying 39 Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/2/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, 8 2:11-CV-283 JCM (GWF) Plaintiff, 9 10 v. IVY CAPITAL, INC., et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 ORDER 14 Presently before the court is defendants Enrich Wealth Group, LLC’s and Joshua F. 15 Wickman’s motion to strike portions of the declaration of Sheryl Novick. (Doc. #39). The plaintiff 16 has responded (doc. #147), but no reply has been filed. 17 In the motion, defendants request that the court strike portions of Novick’s declaration 18 because it summarizes “numerous hearsay statements, anonymous blog postings and other 19 unverifiable documents. . . .” (Doc. #39 at 2:2–3). Defendants contend that the government may not 20 rely on hearsay statements in establishing common enterprise or conspiracy, citing United States v. 21 Casas, 356 F.3d 104, 119 (1st Cir. 2004). 22 As the plaintiff notes in its response brief, this motion is moot following the court’s issuance 23 of the preliminary injunction subsequent to its submission. Additionally, the court agrees with the 24 plaintiff that the motion has no merit, as the Ninth Circuit has held that a court may consider hearsay 25 in deciding whether to issue a preliminary injunction. Johnson v. Couturier, 572 F.3d 1067, 1083 26 (9th Cir. 2009). 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge 1 Accordingly, 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the defendants’ motion 3 4 to strike (doc. #39) is DENIED. DATED May 2, 2011. 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?