Benito et al v. Vericrest Financial, Inc. et al
Filing
25
ORDER Granting 13 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Bank of New York Mellon and Vericrest Financial, Inc. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 19 Defendants' Motion for Stay of Litigation and Discovery Proceedings is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 10/17/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
BEATRIZ Q. BENITO and ROBERT
R. BENITO,
8
Plaintiffs,
9
10
vs.
11
VERICREST FINANCIAL,
INC., et al.,
12
Defendants.
13
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:11-CV-00295-PMP-GWF
ORDER
14
Before the Court for consideration is Defendant Vericrest Financial, Inc.,
15
16
and the Bank of New York Mellon’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc.
17
#13) filed June 21, 2011. Having considered the arguments set forth in this fully
18
briefed motion, and having also considered the arguments of counsel presented at the
19
hearing conducted October 11, 2011, the Court finds that Defendants’ Motion for
20
Judgment on the Pleadings must be granted.
In their Complaint, Plaintiffs allege eight separate Causes of Action for (1)
21
22
unfair lending practices; (2) fraud; (3) deceptive trade practices; (4) intentional
23
misrepresentation; (5) negligent misrepresentation; (6) breach of the implied
24
covenant of good faith and fair dealing; (7) breach of contract; and (8) unjust
25
enrichment.
26
///
At the hearing conducted October 11, 2011, Plaintiffs conceded that their
1
2
claims for fraud, intentional misrepresentation and breach of contract are
3
infirm. However, for the reasons set forth in Defendants’ Motion (Doc. #13) and
4
Reply Memorandum (Doc. #18), the Court finds Plaintiffs’ remaining claims also
5
fail.
6
Plaintiffs’ claim for unfair lending practices must fail because the statute
7
upon which Plaintiff relies, N.R.S. 598D.100(1)(b) did not come into effect until
8
after Plaintiffs’ entered the loan at issue. Plaintiffs’ claims for fraud, deceptive trade
9
practices, intentional misrepresentation and negligent misrepresentation all sound in
10
fraud and are not plead with requisite particularity and fail to specify any
11
misrepresentations made by moving Defendants. Plaintiffs’ claim for breach of the
12
covenant of good faith and fair dealing fails because Defendants have no duty to
13
negotiate a loan modification of Plaintiffs nor are there facts giving rise to a special
14
relationship between the Parties which could be deemed to create and implied
15
covenant. Finally, Plaintiffs’ unjust enrichment claim must be dismissed because
16
such a claim is not available where there is an express, written contract that covers
17
the subject matter of the dispute.
18
19
20
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
(Doc. #13) is GRANTED and that Plaintiffs’ Complaint is hereby dismissed.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Stay of
21
Litigation and Discovery Proceedings Pending a Determination on Motion of
22
Vericrest Financial, Inc., and the Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee, for
23
Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. #19) is DENIED as moot.
24
DATED: October 17, 2011.
25
26
PHILIP M. PRO
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?