Price v. Equinox International Inc./Vitasalus

Filing 6

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 2 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff's complaint if DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which reilef can be granted. Signed by Judge Roger L. Hunt on 5/26/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 *** 12 13 14 15 16 MARY A. PRICE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) EQUINOX INTERNATIONAL/VITASALUS, ) ) Defendant. ) _______________________________________) Case No.: 2:11-cv-00339-RLH-PAL ORDER (Order and Report of Findings and Recommendation–#2) 17 18 Before this Court is the Order and Report of Findings and Recommendation 19 (#2) of the United States Magistrate Judge, entered by the Honorable Peggy A. Leen regarding 20 Plaintiff Mary A. Price’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (#1, filed Mar. 3, 2011). 21 Two objections (#4, #5) were filed to Magistrate Judge Leen’s Report and Recommendation in 22 accordance with Local Rule LR IB 3-2 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court 23 for the District of Nevada. This matter was referred to the undersigned for consideration. 24 The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance 25 with 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B)–(C) and Local Rule IB 3-2 and determines that the Report and 26 Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Leen should be accepted and adopted. AO 72 (Rev. 8/82) 1 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Order and Report of 2 Findings and Recommendation (#2) entered March 18, 2011 is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED, and 3 Plaintiff Mary A. Price’s Complaint (#3) is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which 4 relief can be granted. 5 Dated: May 26, 2011. 6 ____________________________________ ROGER L. HUNT United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 AO 72 (Rev. 8/82) 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?