Stickney v. Skolnik et al

Filing 10

ORDER Granting 8 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 12/12/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7
8

TODD STICKNEY,

9

Plaintiff,

Case No. 2:11-CV-00409-KJD-RJJ
ORDER

10

v.

11

HOWARD SKOLNIK, et al.,

12

Defendants.

13
14

Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss (#8) filed by Defendants Catherine Masto Cortez,

15

James G. Cox, James G. Gibbons, Officer Mellinger, Ross Miller, Cole Morrow, Dwight W. Neven,

16

Howard Skolnik (collectively “Defendants”). Plaintiff has not filed an opposition.

17

Local Rule 7-2(d) provides that failure to oppose a motion “constitute[s] a consent to granting

18

of the motion.” Plaintiff’s opposition was due October 29, 2011. The Court has examined the

19

motion and finds that it has merit. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED the Motion to

20

Dismiss (#8) is GRANTED.

21

DATED this 12th day of December 2011.

22
23
24
25
26

_____________________________
Kent J. Dawson
United States District Judge