Pankey v. Las Vegas Rescue Mission

Filing 6

ORDER Adopting and Affirming 4 Report and Recommendation to Dismiss Complaint with prejudice. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 10/18/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 AISHA PANKEY, 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 Case No. 2:11-CV-00428-KJD-PAL RESCUE MISSION–LAS VEGAS, 14 ORDER Defendant. 15 16 Presently before the Court is the Report of Findings and Recommendation (#4) of Magistrate 17 Judge Peggy A. Leen recommending that Plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed for failure to comply 18 with the Screening Order (#2) and failure to assert a federally cognizable claim. Though the time for 19 doing so has passed, no objections to the magistrate judge’s order have been filed. The Court has 20 conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and 21 LR IB 3-2. The Court finds that the Report of Findings and Recommendation (#4) of the United 22 States Magistrate Judge entered September 27, 2011, should be adopted and affirmed. 23 Furthermore, Court mail addressed to Plaintiff has been returned as unclaimed. Thus, the 24 Court also dismisses the complaint against defendant in accordance with Local Special Rule 2-2 for 25 Plaintiff’s failure to update her current address. 26 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report of Findings and Recommendation (#4) of 2 the United States Magistrate Judge entered September 27, 2011, is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED; 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice for 4 failure to comply with the Court’s Screening Order (#2) and failure to assert a federally 5 cognizable claim, and in accordance with LSR 2-2. 6 DATED this 18th day of October 2011. 7 8 9 10 _____________________________ Kent J. Dawson United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?