Pankey v. Las Vegas Rescue Mission
Filing
6
ORDER Adopting and Affirming 4 Report and Recommendation to Dismiss Complaint with prejudice. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 10/18/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
AISHA PANKEY,
11
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
Case No. 2:11-CV-00428-KJD-PAL
RESCUE MISSION–LAS VEGAS,
14
ORDER
Defendant.
15
16
Presently before the Court is the Report of Findings and Recommendation (#4) of Magistrate
17
Judge Peggy A. Leen recommending that Plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed for failure to comply
18
with the Screening Order (#2) and failure to assert a federally cognizable claim. Though the time for
19
doing so has passed, no objections to the magistrate judge’s order have been filed. The Court has
20
conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and
21
LR IB 3-2. The Court finds that the Report of Findings and Recommendation (#4) of the United
22
States Magistrate Judge entered September 27, 2011, should be adopted and affirmed.
23
Furthermore, Court mail addressed to Plaintiff has been returned as unclaimed. Thus, the
24
Court also dismisses the complaint against defendant in accordance with Local Special Rule 2-2 for
25
Plaintiff’s failure to update her current address.
26
1
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report of Findings and Recommendation (#4) of
2
the United States Magistrate Judge entered September 27, 2011, is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED;
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice for
4
failure to comply with the Court’s Screening Order (#2) and failure to assert a federally
5
cognizable claim, and in accordance with LSR 2-2.
6
DATED this 18th day of October 2011.
7
8
9
10
_____________________________
Kent J. Dawson
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?