Saintal v. Foster et al

Filing 45

ORDER Denying 40 Motion to Add Power of Attorney. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 4/16/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 5 6 7 8 9 PRISCELLA R. SAINTAL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) SHERYL FOSTER, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:11-cv-00445-KJD-PAL ORDER (Mot. for Power of Atty - Dkt. #40) 10 11 12 13 Before the court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Add Power of Attorney (Dkt. #40). The court has reviewed the motion and Defendants’ Opposition (Dkt. #44). Plaintiff is an inmate at the Florence McClure Women’s Correctional Center and is appearing 14 pro se. The court screened her amended complaint and found that she had stated a claim that 15 Defendants have retaliated against her for filing grievances on behalf of a fellow inmate. In the current 16 motion she seeks to add Kimberly Rene Boykins, her life partner, as her power of attorney for purposes 17 of proceedings in this case. She makes this request contending that she suffers from emotional distress, 18 threats and harassment by the Defendants by being placed in segregation, and that her partner is capable 19 of making decisions on her behalf. Defendants oppose the request arguing it is not authorized by law, 20 and Plaintiff has not cited any points and authorities supporting her request. 21 The court appreciates that it is difficult for a pro se litigant to prosecute a federal civil rights 22 case, and that the court has denied Plaintiff’s request for appointment of counsel to represent her. 23 However, a non-lawyer may not engage in the unauthorized practice of law by taking legal action on 24 behalf of a litigant in a federal case. Accordingly, 25 IT IS ORDERED Plaintiff’s Motion to Add Power of Attorney (Dkt. #40) is DENIED. 26 Dated this 16th day of April, 2012. 27 28 ______________________________________ Peggy A. Leen United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?