Poland v. TechSkills, LLC et al
Filing
10
ORDER Denying as moot 8 Motion to Dismiss. Case terminated per 9 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 6/9/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
JOHN R. POLAND,
8
9
10
2:11-CV-450 JCM (PAL)
Plaintiff,
v.
TECHSKILLS, LLC, et al.,
11
Defendants.
12
13
ORDER
14
Presently before the court is defendants TechSkills, LLC and Tom Jenkins’ motion to
15
dismiss. (Doc. #8). Any opposition was due May 15, 2011, and on May 12, 2011, plaintiff John
16
Poland filed a notice of voluntary dismissal (doc. #9).
17
Plaintiff filed his complaint (doc. #1) on March 25, 2011, against defendants Tom Jenkins,
18
TechSkills, LLC, and Richard Vance. In plaintiff’s notice (doc. #9), he voluntarily dismisses the
19
complaint (doc. #1) against all parties without prejudice. In light of the voluntary dismissal,
20
defendants’ motion to dismiss is moot.
21
Accordingly,
22
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED ADJUDGED AND DECREED that defendants TechSkills, LLC
23
and Tom Jenkins’ motion to dismiss (doc. #8) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED as moot.
24
...
25
...
26
...
27
...
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
1
2
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above captioned case be dismissed against all
defendants pursuant to the notice of voluntary dismissal (doc. #9).
DATED June 9, 2011.
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?